Literature DB >> 12967789

Regulatory mechanism of peripheral tolerance: in vitro evidence for dominant suppression of host responses during the maintenance phase of tolerance to renal allografts in miniature swine.

Anette Wu1, Kazuhiko Yamada, Francesco L Ierino, Parsia A Vagefi, David H Sachs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that a short course of cyclosporine leads to indefinite survival of renal allografts across an MHC class-I barrier in miniature swine. We have recently reported that a peripheral regulatory mechanism appears to be involved in the maintenance of this tolerance since peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), exposed to donor antigen in vitro specifically suppressed the generation of anti-donor cytotoxic activity by recipient-matched naive PBL. We have now further investigated the mechanism of this phenomenon to determine the level at which such regulation occurs, and investigated the phenotypes of the cells involved in maintaining dominant suppression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PBL from long-term tolerant animals (>6 months after renal transplantation) were pre-stimulated in vitro with donor-type PBL. These cells were then incubated with recipient-matched naive responders and donor-type PBL stimulators in MLR assays. The proliferative activity of the cells was measured by [3H]-thymidine incorporation. Suppression was measured by inhibition of proliferation of naive cells in response to donor PBL when co-cultured with tolerant cells. Flow cytometry was used to study the phenotypes of cells that were present in cell cultures.
RESULTS: Primed PBL from tolerant animals markedly suppressed the proliferative response of recipient-matched naive cells to donor-matched stimulators in vitro. No suppression of proliferation was observed in response to third party stimulators, indicating that the suppression was donor-specific. Primed PBL from naive animals stimulated with donor antigen and co-cultured with unprimed recipient-matched naive cells also demonstrated reduced proliferative responses. However, this decrease in proliferation appeared to be due to a 'burn-out' phenomenon, as assessed by kinetic studies, rather than due to true suppression. Expression of CD25 increased on a sub-population of T cells from tolerant animals following priming with donor antigen. These cell then markedly inhibited further activation of CD25 positive cells in co-cultures with naive responder cells, suggesting a possible mechanism of suppression.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the mechanism of tolerance to class-I-mismatched renal allografts, involves a population of regulatory cells that are capable of suppressing proliferative anti-donor responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12967789     DOI: 10.1016/S0966-3274(03)00006-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Immunol        ISSN: 0966-3274            Impact factor:   1.708


  8 in total

Review 1.  Why some organ allografts are tolerated better than others: new insights for an old question.

Authors:  Travis D Hull; Gilles Benichou; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 2.  Immuno-intervention for the induction of transplantation tolerance through mixed chimerism.

Authors:  David H Sachs; Megan Sykes; Tatsuo Kawai; A Benedict Cosimi
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 11.130

3.  Evaluating the effects of extended cold ischemia on interstitial metabolite in grafts in kidney transplantation using microdialysis.

Authors:  Hamidreza Fonouni; Parvin Jarahian; Morva Tahmasbi Rad; Mohammad Golriz; Alireza Faridar; Majid Esmaeilzadeh; Mohammadreza Hafezi; Stephan Macher-Goeppinger; Thomas Longerich; Berk Orakcioglu; Oliver W Sakowitz; Camelia Garoussi; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Immunomodulatory Strategies Directed Toward Tolerance of Vascularized Composite Allografts.

Authors:  Maria Lucia L Madariaga; Kumaran Shanmugarajah; Sebastian G Michel; Vincenzo Villani; Glenn M La Muraglia; Radbeh Torabi; David A Leonard; Mark A Randolph; Robert B Colvin; Kazuhiko Yamada; Joren C Madsen; Curtis L Cetrulo; David H Sachs
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Heart transplantation: challenges facing the field.

Authors:  Makoto Tonsho; Sebastian Michel; Zain Ahmed; Alessandro Alessandrini; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  Induction of cardiac allograft tolerance across a full MHC barrier in miniature swine by donor kidney cotransplantation.

Authors:  M L Madariaga; S G Michel; M Tasaki; V Villani; G M La Muraglia; S Sihag; J Gottschall; E A Farkash; A Shimizu; J S Allan; D H Sachs; K Yamada; J C Madsen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Immunohistochemical investigation of Foxp3 expression in the intestine in healthy and diseased dogs.

Authors:  Johannes Junginger; Ulrike Schwittlick; Frederik Lemensieck; Ingo Nolte; Marion Hewicker-Trautwein
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 8.  Transplant Tolerance, Not Only Clonal Deletion.

Authors:  Bruce M Hall; Nirupama D Verma; Giang T Tran; Suzanne J Hodgkinson
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 8.786

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.