| Literature DB >> 12967489 |
Julie Bryant1, Heiman Wang, Cesar Cabezas, Gladys Ramirez, Douglas Watts, Kevin Russell, Alan Barrett.
Abstract
The prevailing paradigm of yellow fever virus (YFV) ecology in South America is that of wandering epizootics. The virus is believed to move from place to place in epizootic waves involving monkeys and mosquitoes, rather than persistently circulating within particular locales. After a large outbreak of YFV illness in Peru in 1995, we used phylogenetic analyses of virus isolates to reexamine the hypothesis of virus movement. We sequenced a 670-nucleotide fragment of the prM/E gene region from 25 Peruvian YFV samples collected from 1977 to 1999, and delineated six clades representing the states (Departments) of Puno, Pasco, Junin, Ayacucho, San Martin/Huanuco, and Cusco. The concurrent appearance of at least four variants during the 1995 epidemic and the genetic stability of separate virus lineages over time indicate that Peruvian YFV is locally maintained and circulates continuously in discrete foci of enzootic transmission.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12967489 PMCID: PMC3023271 DOI: 10.3201/eid0908.030075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Peruvian yellow fever isolates used in this studya
| Strain ID | Date of illness onset | Sequence ID | Department | Community | Elevationb | Ecozone | Passage historyc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1362/77 | 6/1977 | PERU77A | Ayacucho | San Francisco | 1,000–2,000 | df-S or df-LM | c6/36#2 |
| 1368 | 6/1977 | PERU77B | Ayacucho | Tribolina | 1,000–2,000 | vhf-S | SM1, Vero1, C6/36#2 |
| 1371 | 6/1977 | PERU77C | Ayacucho | Chontacocha | 0–1,000 | hf-S | SM1, Vero1, C6/36#2 |
| 287/78 | 2/22/1978 | PERU78 | Ayacucho | San Francisco | 1,000–2,000 | sf-S | SM1, Mosq 2 |
| R 35740 | 2/1979 | PERU79 | Ayacucho | Alto Montaro | 0–1,000 | vhf-S | SM1, Mosq 2 |
| 1899/81 | 6/19/1981 | PERU81A | Cusco | Cusco | 2,000–3,000 | hf-M | SM1 |
| 1914c | 6/12/1981 | PERU81B | Cusco | Cusco | 2,000–3,000 | hf-M | LLCMK2, Vero 1, C6/36#1 |
| ARVO544 | 1995 | PERU95A | San Martin | Tocache Huaquisha | 0–1,000 | hf-T near vhf-S | SM1, Vero1, C6/36#2 |
| HEB4224 | 1995 | PERU95B | San Martin | Tocache Nuevo Progresso | 2,000–3,000 | hf-T near vhf-S, vhf-LM | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| HEB4236 | 3/2/1995 | PERU95C | Pasco | Oxapampa Villa Rica | 1,000–2,000 | hf-M | C6/36#1 |
| 149 | 3/95 | PERU95D | Pasco | Oxapampa Villa Rica | 1,000–2,000 | hf-M | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| Cepa#2 | 9/95 | PERU95E | Puno | No data | 2,000–3,000 | hf-S | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| Cepa#1 | 9/95 | PERU95F | Puno | No data | 2,000–3,000 | hf-S | C6/36#2 |
| OBS 2240 | 2/95 | PERU95G | Huanuco | Hermil | 1,000–2,000 | vhf-LM | C6/36#2 |
| OBS 2250 | 5/16/1995 | PERU95H | Huanuco | Hermil | 1,000–2,000 | vhf-LM | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| HEB 4240 | 1/30/1995 | PERU95I | Junin | Chachamayo | 1,000–2,000 | hf-LM | C6/36#1, SM1 |
| HEB 4245 | 3/6/1995 | PERU95J | Junin | Chachamayo | 1,000–2,000 | hf-LM | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| HEB 4246 | 3/8/1995 | PERU95K | Junin | Chachamayo | 1,000–2,000 | hf-LM | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| OBS 2243 | 2/95 | PERU95L | Huanuco | No data | 1,000–2,000 | vhf-LM | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| ARV 0548 | 3/19/1995 | PERU95M | San Martin | Tocache Huaquisha | 0–1,000 | hf-T near vhf-S | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| OBS 6530 | 3/26/1998 | PERU98A | Cusco | Echarate | 1,000–2,000 | df-S | SM1, C6/36#1 |
| 03-5350-98 | 3/13/1998 | PERU98B | Cusco | Kanaiquinaba | 2,000–3,000 | sf-S | C6/36#2 |
| OBS 6745 | 3/29/1998 | PERU98C | Cusco | Minsa/C.S. Moronacocha | 1,000–2,000 | hf-M | C6/36#2 |
| IQT 5591 | 1/19/1998 | PERU98D | Loreto | Belen, Tihuensa | 0–1,000 | hf-T | C6/36#2 |
| OBS 7904 | 5/5/1999 | PERU99 | San Martin | Tarapoto | 2,000–3,000 | hf-S and vhf-S | Vero1, C6/36#3 |
aSM, suckling mouse; df-S, dry forest-subtropical; df-LM, dry forest-lower montane; vhf-S, very humid forest-subtropical; hf-S, humid forest-subtropical; sf-S, shrub forest-subtropical; hf-M, humid forest-montane; hf-T, humid forest-tropical; vhf-LM, very humid forest-lower montane; hf-LM, humid forest-lower montane. bElevation, range of meters above sea level for the ecozone immediately surrounding the place of viral origin. cPassage history of seed strain in collection. dStrain 1914 was obtained from a sentinel mouse.
Figure 1A) Peruvian river basins in which yellow fever virus is endemic. B) Annual incidence of confirmed cases of yellow fever in Peru, 1972–2001.
Figure 2Maximum likelihood phylogeny of prM/E sequences of Peruvian yellow fever isolates constructed using PAUP*, 4.0b4a (). Horizontal branch lengths represent genetic divergence, and numbers above the branch lengths denote support for individual clades as determined by nonparametric bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates (first value) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (second value). Only the values relevant for the interpretation of results are given. The strains used are listed in Table 1.
Figure 3Amino acid alignment for the 25 Peruvian yellow fever virus. Dots indicate identity with prototype Asibi strain (from Ghana, 1927).
Signature amino acid and nucleotide substitutions of Peruvian YFV genetic variants, based upon sequence analysis of prM-E gene fragments of 24 isolates
| Signature substitutions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department | No. of Isolates | nt | Amino acid | Coding changes from consensus of Peruvian strains |
| Ayacucho | 5 | 1 | 0 | None |
| Cusco | 5 | 1 | 0 | None |
| Junin | 3 | 1 | 0 | None |
| Puno | 2 | 7 | 1 | R→ K prM102 |
| Pasco | 2 | 3 | 3 | A→T M48; A→V M50; L→F M52 |
| San Martin/Huanuco | 7 | 7 | 2 | I→V E70; H→N E90 |
Figure 4Schematic topographic cross-section through the southern Peruvian Amazon. Areas in red indicate river basins where yellow fever virus is endemic.