Literature DB >> 12966421

Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation is associated with p53 expression, germline BRCA1 mutations and an adverse outcome following breast cancer.

J R Goffin1, O Straume, P O Chappuis, J-S Brunet, L R Bégin, N Hamel, N Wong, L A Akslen, W D Foulkes.   

Abstract

Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation (GMP) in breast cancer independently adversely affected survival (relative risk 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-3.0), particularly among women who received adjuvant chemotherapy (10-year survival 27 vs 69%, P=0.0003), and was significantly associated with p53 overexpression and BRCA1 germline mutations. The presence of GMP may influence treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966421      PMCID: PMC2376955          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Angiogenesis is under intense study both for its prognostic value and for the potential therapeutic value of interfering with angiogenic pathways. In breast cancer, both higher vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels (Blackwood and Weber, 1998; Linderholm ) and increased microvessel density (MVD) (Weidner , 1992; de Jong ) are associated with a poorer prognosis. Recent microarray studies have also identified an association between the expression of genes involved in angiogenesis, such as VEGF, and poor prognosis following breast cancer (van't Veer ). Furthermore, the proangiogenic genes COL4A1 and ECGF1 are overexpressed in breast cancers found in BRCA1 mutation carriers, although their prognostic value in such women is unknown (van't Veer ). Here, we describe our results with a morphological marker of prognosis of potential importance in the management of women who carry germline BRCA1 mutations. Glomeruloid microvascular proliferations (GMPs) (Figure 1) are focal proliferative buddings of vascular endothelial cells resembling a renal glomerulus. Glomerular microvascular proliferation has been predominantly associated with glioblastoma multiforme (Wesseling ), the most aggressive form of glioma. They can be produced in athymic mice by overexpressing VEGF using an adenovirus vector (Sundberg ). Recent evidence suggests that these structures may be present and prognostically useful in other tumour types, including breast cancer (Straume ). The work presented here is an expansion of the breast cancer data presented by Straume et al, and focuses on two new aspects: (1) the inter-relationship between GMP, p53 overexpression and BRCA1/2 status and (2) the effect of GMP on prognosis in the presence or absence of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Figure 1

A GMP from a BRCA1:5382insC-related breast cancer is shown.

A GMP from a BRCA1:5382insC-related breast cancer is shown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 292 consecutive Ashkenazi Jewish women aged 65 years or less with primary nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosed at one Montreal institution between 1980 and 1995 were assessed. Sufficient follow-up and tissue were available for 251 subjects. Following ethics committee approval, specimens were evaluated by one pathologist (LR Bégin) using conventional methods. Accumulation of p53 protein was detected by immunohistochemistry as previously described (Yuan ). Pathology blocks from all women were tested for founder BRCA1 mutations (185delAG, n=18; 5382insC, n=10) and BRCA2 mutation (6174delT, n=8) that are common in this population, using established techniques (Foulkes ). Staining of endothelial cells by Factor-VIII (A-0082, Dako, Copenhagen) was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded archival material as previously published (Straume and Akslen, 2001). The presence of GMP was recorded by the finding of focal glomerulus-like aggregates of closely associated and multilayered factor-VIII positive endothelial cells. Glomerular microvascular proliferations consisted of 15–100 cells. Lumen formation was not necessary for the aggregates to be counted as GMPs. Tangentially sectioned normal vessels, or nonspecific Factor-VIII positivity in stromal components, were excluded. Glomerular microvascular proliferations were categorised as being absent (group 0), rare (not more than one per high-power field (HPF), group 1), or greater than 1 per HPF (group 2). Microvascular density was calculated as the mean number of stained vessels in 10 high-power fields (× 400). Molecular, pathological and clinical assessments were collected in a mutually blinded manner in a retrospective cohort approach. Subject characteristics were compared using Wilcoxon, t-test, and Fisher's exact testing, with trends in increasing odds ratios being assessed by Cochran–Armitage's test. Differences in breast cancer-specific survival were calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In all, 43 breast cancers (17%) had one or more GMP, with 36 tumours in group 1 and seven in group 2. Their presence was associated with higher nuclear grade (P for trend <0.0001), oestrogen receptor (ER) negativity (OR 4.7, 95% CI: 2.3–9.6), p53 immunohistochemical positivity (OR 4.1, 95% CI: 2.0–8.2), and germline BRCA1 mutations (odds ratio (OR) 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1–6.3), but not tumour size, axillary nodal status, microvascular density (MVD) or germline BRCA2 mutations (Table 1 ). There was no relationship between higher GMP grouping and higher MVD or BRCA1 mutation type.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

CharacteristicaSubjects with GMP (percent) n=43Subjects without GMP (percent) n=208P-value
Age, median (range)50.1 (31.6–65.9)53.2 (26.5–65.3)0.57
Tumour size, median (cm) (238)2.01.80.15
Nuclear grade (249)   
 12 (4)61 (30) 
 215 (35)84 (41)<0.0001b
 326 (60)61 (30) 
Oestrogen receptor (247)   
 Positive14 (33)144 (70) 
 Negative28 (67)61 (30)<0.0001
Lymph node status (228)   
 Positive17 (44)90 (48)0.73
 Negative22 (56)99 (52) 
Microvascular density (251)   
 Median (range)112.5 (43.8-306.3)115.6 (37.5-393.8)0.27
BRCA-carrier status   
BRCA1 carrier9 (21)19 (9)0.04
BRCA2 carrier1 (2)7 (3)0.99
 Non-carrier33 (77)182 (88) 
p53 IHC (245)   
 Positive21 (50)40 (20) 
 Negative21 (50)163 (80)0.0001

GMP=glomeruloid vascular proliferation; IHC=immunohistochemistry.

Number in parenthesis indicates cases with available data.

For trend.

GMP=glomeruloid vascular proliferation; IHC=immunohistochemistry. Number in parenthesis indicates cases with available data. For trend. There were 65 breast cancer deaths in this series of women at 10 years follow-up. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that 50.3% of women with GMP died of breast cancer over this period, whereas the mortality was 25.7% for those with no identified GMP (P=0.0003). Microvascular density was not significantly associated with a worse prognosis (P=0.47). In a Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of GMP (defined continuously) was associated with a poor prognosis (relative risk (RR) 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2–3.0) as was positive lymph node status (RR 2.3). Nuclear grade (RR 1.6) and negative ER status (RR 1.7) were of borderline significance, while tumour size, p53 positivity and carrier status did not achieve significance (Table 2 ). Among women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, the presence of GMP was an indicator of poor prognosis (10-year survival 27 vs 69%, P=0.0003), while among women not treated with chemotherapy, no statistically significant difference in survival was seen on the basis of GMP status (10-year survival 75 vs 79%, P=0.4).
Table 2

Cox proportional hazards model for breast cancer specific mortality

 Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis (n=247)
VariableRR (95% CI)P-valueRR (95% CI)P-value
Tumour size (cm)
<21.0 1.0 
 ⩾22.8 (1.6-4.9)0.00021.6 (0.9-3.0)0.1
Nuclear gradea2.5 (1.7-3.5)0.00011.6 (1.03-2.4)0.04
 
ER status
 Positive1.0 1.0 
 Negative3.0 (1.8-4.8)0.00011.7 (0.95-3.0)0.07
 
Lymph nodes    
 Negative1.0 1.0 
 Positive2.5 (1.5-4.4)0.00072.3 (1.3-3.4)0.004
 
Mutation carrier status
 Non-carriers1.0 1.0 
BRCA1 carriers1.7 (0.9-3.4)0.1  
BRCA2 carriers1.9 (0.6-6.2)0.3  
BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers1.8 (0.96-3.2)0.07b1.1 (0.6-2.0)0.8b
 
p53 IHC
 Negative1.0 1.0 
 Positive2.5 (1.5-4.1)0.00031.3 (0.7-2.2)0.4
 
 GMPa2.4 (1.6-3.5)0.00011.9 (1.2-3.0)0.006

ER=oestrogen receptor; GMP=glomeruloid microvascular proliferation; IHC=immunohistochemistry; MVD=microvascular density. The model was adjusted for cases with missing tumour size (n=13) and missing lymph node status (n=23).

As a continuous variable.

BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers combined compared with non-carriers.

ER=oestrogen receptor; GMP=glomeruloid microvascular proliferation; IHC=immunohistochemistry; MVD=microvascular density. The model was adjusted for cases with missing tumour size (n=13) and missing lymph node status (n=23). As a continuous variable. BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers combined compared with non-carriers.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to demonstrate that GMP is associated with p53 expression and the presence of germline BRCA1 mutations and it suggests that the presence of GMP is an independent risk factor for death from breast cancer comparable in magnitude to conventional prognostic factors (RR 1.9). Notably, GMP was not associated with a higher MVD, and the latter was not prognostic for poor survival in our cohort of patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor is implicated in the genesis of both GMP (Sundberg ) and increased MVD (De Paola ), but the lack of association between GMP and MVD suggests that their developmental pathways may differ. In our cohort, p53 expression was associated with the presence of GMP, but not with increased MVD (P=0.8), the latter being consistent with the literature (Tas ). Functional p53 impedes angiogenesis through the regulation of VEGF transcriptional factors Sp1 (Mandlekar and Kong, 2001) and the HIF-1α subunit (Ravi ), as well as by upregulating thrombospondin-1 expression (Dameron ). Mutated p53 may be one pathway by which a neovascular phenotype associated with GMP (but not MVD) formation is promoted. Our data suggest that GMP is associated with p53 expression and BRCA1 germline mutations and that all three of these factors may be associated with a worse survival (for details of the p53-BRCA1 relationship, see Goffin ). Interestingly, patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had a poorer outcome if their tumours demonstrated GMP. Glomerular microvascular proliferation was highly significantly associated with p53 expression (P=0.0001), a protein partly responsible for inducing apoptosis in chemotherapy-treated cells and thus potentially responsible for diminished responsiveness to chemotherapy (Fisher, 2001). Opposed to this is the association of GMP with BRCA1 mutations and higher nuclear grade, both of which appear to increase tumour responsiveness to chemotherapy (Chappuis ;Wang ). In the present study, higher nuclear grade (RR 1.9, P=0.02) and age < 50 years (RR 5.6, P=0.0001) were associated with an increased likelihood of a woman receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, while other factors were not significant on multivariate analysis. The apparent contradiction in associations and chemoresponsiveness is likely a product of the interplay of several response mitigating pathways and the incomplete association between measured factors. There is evidence that BRCA1-related breast cancers have a distinct profile on microarray analysis (van't Veer ) and that these cancers have a distinctive spectrum of TP53 mutations (Greenblatt ). Along with evidence that BRCA1 is important in global nucleotide excision repair (Hartman and Ford, 2002), these data hint that BRCA1 mutations induce a genetic profile of which p53 expression and GMP are but two manifestations, with several factors influencing both prognosis and response to treatment. However, the role of BRCA1 mutations in the genesis of such a phenotype requires further investigation. Angiogenesis is a complex process and its full understanding will require analysis at the level of morphology and gene expression. Here, we describe the poor prognosis associated with GMP, which is a highly characteristic lesion resulting from a gene expression profile that is as yet undefined. As antiangiogenic therapy is currently under intense investigation, it will be important to establish whether the presence of GMP alters the effectiveness of such therapies.
  23 in total

1.  Hot spot microvessel density and the mitotic activity index are strong additional prognostic indicators in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  J S de Jong; P J van Diest; J P Baak
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation follows adenoviral vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor-164 gene delivery.

Authors:  C Sundberg; J A Nagy; L F Brown; D Feng; I A Eckelhoefer; E J Manseau; A M Dvorak; H F Dvorak
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  A significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 related breast cancer.

Authors:  P O Chappuis; J Goffin; N Wong; C Perret; P Ghadirian; P N Tonin; W D Foulkes
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  BRCA1 and BRCA2: from molecular genetics to clinical medicine.

Authors:  M A Blackwood; B L Weber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Mechanisms of tamoxifen-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  S Mandlekar; A N Kong
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Vascular endothelial growth factor and prognosis in patients with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Franca De Paola; Anna Maria Granato; Emanuela Scarpi; Franco Monti; Laura Medri; Simonetta Bianchi; Dino Amadori; Annalisa Volpi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-10       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  N Weidner; J P Semple; W R Welch; J Folkman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  N Weidner; J Folkman; F Pozza; P Bevilacqua; E N Allred; D H Moore; S Meli; G Gasparini
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-12-16       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Impact of germline BRCA1 mutations and overexpression of p53 on prognosis and response to treatment following breast carcinoma: 10-year follow up data.

Authors:  John R Goffin; Pierre O Chappuis; Louis R Bégin; Nora Wong; Jean-Sébastien Brunet; Nancy Hamel; Ann-Josée Paradis; Jeff Boyd; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Germ-line BRCA1 mutation is an adverse prognostic factor in Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer.

Authors:  W D Foulkes; N Wong; J S Brunet; L R Bégin; J C Zhang; J J Martinez; F Rozen; P N Tonin; S A Narod; S E Karp; M N Pollak
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  12 in total

1.  Early Actions of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Drugs on Angiogenic Blood Vessels.

Authors:  Basel Sitohy; Sunghee Chang; Tracey E Sciuto; Elizabeth Masse; Mei Shen; Peter M Kang; Shou-Ching Jaminet; Laura E Benjamin; Rupal S Bhatt; Ann M Dvorak; Janice A Nagy; Harold F Dvorak
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  BRCA1 and BRCA2: chemosensitivity, treatment outcomes and prognosis.

Authors:  William D Foulkes
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Heterogeneity of the tumor vasculature.

Authors:  Janice A Nagy; Sung-Hee Chang; Shou-Ching Shih; Ann M Dvorak; Harold F Dvorak
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 4.  Vascular hyperpermeability, angiogenesis, and stroma generation.

Authors:  Janice A Nagy; Ann M Dvorak; Harold F Dvorak
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  Triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Reinaldo D Chacón; María V Costanzo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  Crosstalk between the DNA damage response, histone modifications and neovascularisation.

Authors:  Athanassios Vassilopoulos; Chu-Xia Deng; Triantafyllos Chavakis
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.085

7.  Identification of the first case of germline duplication of BRCA1 exon 13 in an Italian family.

Authors:  Roberta Cerutti; Nora Sahnane; Ileana Carnevali; Daniela Furlan; Maria Grazia Tibiletti; Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Carlo Capella
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  In pursuit of new anti-angiogenic therapies for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jun Cai; Song Han; Ruan Qing; Daiqing Liao; Brian Law; Michael E Boulton
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2011-01-01

9.  Increased angiogenesis is associated with a 32-gene expression signature and 6p21 amplification in aggressive endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ingunn M Stefansson; Maria Raeder; Elisabeth Wik; Monica Mannelqvist; Kanthida Kusonmano; Gøril Knutsvik; Ingfrid Haldorsen; Jone Trovik; Anne M Øyan; Karl-H Kalland; Anne Cathrine Staff; Helga B Salvesen; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-30

10.  Are BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancers associated with increased mortality?

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.