Literature DB >> 12966378

Reducing the "killer turn" in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Ting-Wen Huang1, Ching-Jen Wang, Lin-Hsiu Weng, Yi-Sheng Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Graft abrasion caused by sharp graft angulation at the graft-tunnel margin of the proximal tibia (the "killer turn") may cause graft failure after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using the traditional anteromedial route tibial tunnel. One method to reduce the graft angulation is to use the anterolateral route tibial tunnel. However, less acute graft angulation may increase joint translation because of a decrease in graft compressive force. The purpose of this study was to compare the graft angulation and joint translation between anteromedial and anterolateral route tibial tunnels. TYPE OF STUDY: Biomechanical study.
METHODS: Twelve above-the-knee amputation specimens were used in this study. Anteromedial and anterolateral tibial tunnels were made at the desired locations, and the same femoral tunnel was used. Graft angulation was measured by inserting a malleable pin into the tibial and femoral tunnels. Measurements of graft angulation were performed with the knee in extension and in 90 degrees of flexion. The joint translation was measured by the posterior translation of the tibia on the femur at 90 degrees of flexion with a 15-lb posterior force applied to the anterior proximal tibia after PCL reconstruction through the respective tunnels.
RESULTS: The difference in graft angulation between anterolateral and anteromedial route tibial tunnels was statistically significant (P <.001); however, the difference in joint translation showed no statistical significance between the 2 tunnel routes.
CONCLUSIONS: The anterolateral route tibial tunnel significantly reduced the sharp graft angulation ("killer turn") at the graft tunnel margin of the proximal tibia, but it did not increase the joint translation as compared with the traditional anteromedial route tibial tunnel. The anterolateral route tibial tunnel is thought to be a better choice when arthroscopic PCL reconstruction is performed with the tunnel technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966378     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00394-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Joon Ho Wang; Jae Gyoon Kim; Do Kyung Lee; Hong Chul Lim; Jin Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Long-term outcomes following single-bundle transtibial arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tarek Boutefnouchet; Malek Bentayeb; Qutub Qadri; Salman Ali
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Effects of femoral bone tunnel characteristics on graft-bending angle in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the outside-in and transportal techniques.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Katsuya Nagai; Kengo Harato; Yasunori Suda; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  What Is the Maximum Tibial Tunnel Angle for Transtibial PCL Reconstruction? A Comparison Based on Virtual Radiographs, CT Images, and 3D Knee Models.

Authors:  Yuanjun Teng; Lijun Da; Gengxin Jia; Jie Hu; Zhongcheng Liu; Shifeng Zhang; Hua Han; Yayi Xia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Ji-Hoon Chang; Kyung-Soo Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis of simulated early motion and partial and full weightbearing on common reconstruction grafts.

Authors:  William R Mook; David Civitarese; Travis Lee Turnbull; Nicholas I Kennedy; Luke O'Brien; Jarod B Schoeberl; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  [The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement].

Authors:  Yipeng Lin; Wufeng Cai; Xihao Huang; Jian Li; Qi Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

8.  The mechanism of "killer turn" causing residual laxity after transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yue Li; Jin Zhang; Guanyang Song; Xu Li; Hua Feng
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2016-01-21

9.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by means of tibial tunnel: anatomical study on cadavers for tunnel positioning.

Authors:  Antônio Altenor Bessa de Queiroz; César Janovsky; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi; Leonardo Addêo Ramos; Geraldo Sérgio Mello Granata Junior; Marcos Vinicius Malheiros Luzo; Moises Cohen
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-05-05

10.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Versus Achilles Tendon Bone Block Allograft.

Authors:  Brian Forsythe; Marc S Haro; Ljiljana Bogunovic; Michael J Collins; Thomas A Arns; Katie J Trella; Elizabeth F Shewman; Nikhil N Verma; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.