Literature DB >> 12966365

Increased warfarin doses and decreased international normalized ratio response after nationwide generic switching.

Hillel Halkin1, Jonathan Shapiro, Daniel Kurnik, Ronen Loebstein, Varda Shalev, Ehud Kokia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine possible changes in the effectiveness of warfarin after a nationwide generic substitution of formulations in 1998.
METHODS: In the computerized records of a health maintenance organization database, we identified 975 patients who took warfarin continuously over two 6-month periods, before (period 1) and after (period 2) the generic switch. In this sample we performed a retrospective, between-period paired comparison of warfarin doses dispensed and international normalized ratio (INR) levels maintained, as well as of the apparent warfarin sensitivity index (calculated as INR/Warfarin dose [in milligrams per day]).
RESULTS: Overall, for period 2, doses were 26.5% higher and INR 4.2% lower, with a 14.7% reduction in warfarin sensitivity index (P <.001). The findings were strongest in the 61 of 975 patients (6.3%) dispensed the lowest maintenance doses (<1.0 mg/d), with minimal change at greater than 3 mg/d. In 94 other patients (9.6%) in whom doses were unchanged, INR (median with 5th and 95th percentiles) dropped to subtherapeutic levels, from 2.2 (1.8, 3.0) to 1.7 (1.3, 1.8) (P <.001). There were no adverse events, expressed as no change in hospital admissions. Apparent warfarin sensitivity was reduced in period 2 by 15% to 20% (P <.001) across all period 1 INR levels.
CONCLUSION: Because a general unidirectional change in INR response per unit warfarin dose cannot be explained by biologic mechanisms or confounding, we conclude that slightly reduced bioavailability (within the acceptable bioequivalence range) of the new formulation led to overestimated period 2 doses and reduced apparent warfarin sensitivity in all patient subgroups (by period 1 dose or INR), which was most prominent in those individuals with the lowest maintenance dose requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966365     DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00166-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  13 in total

1.  Determinants of Generic Drug Substitution in the United States.

Authors:  Jodi B Segal; Oluwadamilola Onasanya; Matthew Daubresse; Chia-Ying Lee; Mischka Moechtar; Xia Pu; Sarah K Dutcher; Robert J Romanelli
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.778

2.  Effects of fasting on warfarin sensitivity index in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  Yoshiki Katada; Shunsaku Nakagawa; Akiko Nishimura; Yu-Ki Sato; Hiromi Taue; Katsuyuki Matsumura; Kazuhiro Yamazaki; Kenji Minakata; Ikuko Yano; Tomohiro Omura; Satoshi Imai; Atsushi Yonezawa; Yuki Sato; Takayuki Nakagawa; Kenji Minatoya; Kazuo Matsubara
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Effects of vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 gene polymorphisms on warfarin control in Japanese patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD).

Authors:  Kazuki Nakagita; Kyoichi Wada; Yutaro Mukai; Takaya Uno; Ryoji Nishino; Sachi Matsuda; Hiromi Takenaka; Nobue Terakawa; Akira Oita; Mitsutaka Takada
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  [Switching from clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate to clopidogrel besylate. Impaired antiplatelet effect in patients with ischemic stroke].

Authors:  S H Meves; U Overbeck; A Kaiser; C Krogias; H Neubauer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Alexander S Misono; Joy L Lee; Margaret R Stedman; M Alan Brookhart; Niteesh K Choudhry; William H Shrank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  A composite screening tool for medication reviews of outpatients: general issues with specific examples.

Authors:  Peter A G M De Smet; Wilma Denneboom; Cees Kramers; Richard Grol
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  The Magnitude of the Warfarin-Amiodarone Drug-Drug Interaction Varies With Renal Function: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Todd A Miano; Wei Yang; Michael G S Shashaty; Athena Zuppa; Jeremiah R Brown; Sean Hennessy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  The Impact of Generic Substitution on Health and Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  H Gothe; I Schall; K Saverno; M Mitrovic; A Luzak; D Brixner; U Siebert
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.561

9.  Comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of branded and generic formulations of meloxicam in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Mario Del Tacca; Giuseppe Pasqualetti; Giovanni Gori; Pasquale Pepe; Antonello Di Paolo; Marianna Lastella; Ferdinando De Negri; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Interaction between warfarin and short-term intravenous amiodarone in intensive care unit patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Tomoki Takase; Hiroaki Ikesue; Makiko Tohi; Hiroshi Ueta; Hiroyuki Mima; Tadaaki Koyama; Tohru Hashida
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2018-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.