Literature DB >> 12966275

Negative pressure dressings as an alternative technique for the treatment of infected wounds.

Montri D Wongworawat1, Stephen B Schnall, Paul D Holtom, Charles Moon, Francis Schiller.   

Abstract

Coverage of wounds caused by infection and subsequent treatment often are variable because of the location of the wound and wound size. Although much research has been done to expand the indications of negative pressure wound treatment systems, little investigation has been done to quantify the reduction of wound size for vacuum-assisted closure treatment in the presence of infection. In this series, 14 patients who had wounds caused by infections were treated with the vacuum-assisted wound closure system. All wounds were greater than 20 cm2. The duration of treatment averaged 10 days (range, 2-27 days), and the initial wound size averaged 70 cm2 (range, 22.5-288 cm2). After the course of treatment, the final wound size averaged 39 cm2 (range, 10-147 cm2). The average wound size reduction was 43%. This method seems to enhance the rapidity of wound reduction, and because it is a closed system of treatment, it has the added benefit of minimizing exposure of staff and other patients to communicable diseases. Vacuum-assisted wound closure systems add another option in the care of musculoskeletal infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966275     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000084400.53464.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

Review 1.  Management of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Marco Meloni; Valentina Izzo; Erika Vainieri; Laura Giurato; Valeria Ruotolo; Luigi Uccioli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-05-18

2.  VAC therapy to promote wound healing after surgical revascularisation for critical lower limb ischaemia.

Authors:  Giovanni De Caridi; Mafalda Massara; Michele Greco; Narayana Pipitò; Francesco Spinelli; Raffaele Grande; Lucia Butrico; Stefano de Franciscis; Raffaele Serra
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Negative-pressure wound therapy: a snapshot of the evidence.

Authors:  Derick A Mendonca; Remo Papini; Patricia E Price
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Impact of negative pressure wound therapy on open diaphyseal tibial fractures: A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Siddharth R Virani; Aditya A Dahapute; S S Bava; Saurabh R Muni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-07-16

Review 5.  Clinical outcome of diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy and the transition from acute care to home care.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wu; David G Armstrong
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Vacuum-assisted closure of a large palmar defect after debriding a midpalmar tuberculous abscess.

Authors:  Gavin C W Kang; Andrew Yam
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in patients with wound complications following tumour surgery.

Authors:  Ugur Mermerkaya; Senol Bekmez; Erkan Alkan; Mehmet Ayvaz; Mazhar Tokgozoglu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Posttraumatic reconstruction of the ankle using the Ilizarov method.

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2005-09

9.  Necrotizing fasciitis of the abdominal wall with lethal outcome: a case report.

Authors:  Dubravko Huljev
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.920

10.  Negative pressure wound therapy for soft tissue injuries around the foot and ankle.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Lee; Joon-Woo Kim; Chang-Wug Oh; Woo-Kie Min; Oog-Jin Shon; Jong-Keon Oh; Byung-Chul Park; Joo-Chul Ihn
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.