Literature DB >> 12966177

Classification of retinal ganglion cells: a statistical approach.

Stephen M Carcieri1, Adam L Jacobs, Sheila Nirenberg.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that retinal ganglion cells exhibit an array of responses to visual stimuli. This has led to the idea that these cells can be sorted into distinct physiological classes, such as linear versus nonlinear or on versus off. Although many classification schemes are widely accepted, few studies have provided statistical support to favor one scheme over another. Here we test whether some of the most widely used classification schemes can be statistically verified, using the mouse retina as the model system. We used a cluster analysis approach and focused on 4 standard response parameters: 1) response latency, 2) response duration, 3) relative amplitude of the on and off responses, and 4) degree of nonlinearity in the stimulus-to-response transformation. For each parameter, we plotted its distribution and tested quantitatively, using a bootstrap method, whether it divided into distinct clusters. Our analysis showed that mouse ganglion cells clustered into several groups based on response latency, duration, and relative amplitude of the on and off responses, but did not cluster into more than one group based on degree of nonlinearity-the latter formed a single, large, continuous group. Thus while some well-known schemes for classifying ganglion cells could be statistically verified, others could not. Knowledge of which schemes can be confirmed is important for building models of how retinal output is processed and how retinal circuits are built. Finally, this cluster analysis approach is general and can be used to test other classification proposals as well, both physiological and anatomical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966177     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00127.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  41 in total

1.  Heterogeneous response dynamics in retinal ganglion cells: the interplay of predictive coding and adaptation.

Authors:  Sheila Nirenberg; Illya Bomash; Jonathan W Pillow; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Connexin 36 and rod bipolar cell independent rod pathways drive retinal ganglion cells and optokinetic reflexes.

Authors:  Cameron S Cowan; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Meike van der Heijden; Eric M Lo; David Paul; Debra E Bramblett; Janis Lem; David L Simons; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Ruling out and ruling in neural codes.

Authors:  Adam L Jacobs; Gene Fridman; Robert M Douglas; Nazia M Alam; Peter E Latham; Glen T Prusky; Sheila Nirenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interacting linear and nonlinear characteristics produce population coding asymmetries between ON and OFF cells in the retina.

Authors:  Zachary Nichols; Sheila Nirenberg; Jonathan Victor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Physiological clustering of visual channels in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Karl Farrow; Richard H Masland
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Visual pattern recognition based on spatio-temporal patterns of retinal ganglion cells' activities.

Authors:  Wei Jing; Wen-Zhong Liu; Xin-Wei Gong; Hai-Qing Gong; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Pathway-Specific Asymmetries between ON and OFF Visual Signals.

Authors:  Sneha Ravi; Daniel Ahn; Martin Greschner; E J Chichilnisky; Greg D Field
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Characterization of retinal ganglion cell, horizontal cell, and amacrine cell types expressing the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase Ret.

Authors:  Nadia Parmhans; Szilard Sajgo; Jingwen Niu; Wenqin Luo; Tudor Constantin Badea
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Photochemical restoration of visual responses in blind mice.

Authors:  Aleksandra Polosukhina; Jeffrey Litt; Ivan Tochitsky; Joseph Nemargut; Yivgeny Sychev; Ivan De Kouchkovsky; Tracy Huang; Katharine Borges; Dirk Trauner; Russell N Van Gelder; Richard H Kramer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Diverse visual features encoded in mouse lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Denise M Piscopo; Rana N El-Danaf; Andrew D Huberman; Cristopher M Niell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.