Literature DB >> 12964652

Antimicrobial activity of different concentrations of NaOCl and chlorhexidine using a contact test.

Luciana Moura Sassone1, Rivail Antonio Sergio Fidel, Sandra Rivera Fidel, Marina Dias, Raphael Júnior Hirata.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the in vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite (1% and 5%) and chlorhexidine (0.12%, 0.5% and 1%). Bacterial samples (ATCC) of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum were submitted to a contact test. Solutions were evaluated at different time intervals: immediately, 5 min, 15 min, and 30 min after contact and repeated 10 times. The results of the contact test showed that 0.12% chlorhexidine did not eliminate E. faecalis at any time interval, while 0.5% and 1% chlorhexidine and 1% and 5% sodium hypochlorite did. These results permit us to conclude that to obtain better antimicrobial activity, chlorhexidine in a concentration greater than 0.12% should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12964652     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000200005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  8 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of chlorhexidine and persica on alveolar bone healing following tooth extraction in rats, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mojtaba Dorri; Shokufeh Shahrabi; Alireza Navabazam
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.

Authors:  Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron; Anne-Marie Glenny; Frédéric Courson; Pierre Durieux; Michele Muller-Bolla; Helene Fron Chabouis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-31

3.  Antimicrobial assay of combination surfactant irrigant regimen on vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. An in vitro direct contact test.

Authors:  Manikandan Ravinanthanan; Mithra N Hegde; Veena A Shetty; Suchetha Kumari
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

4.  In vitro comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of QMix and other final irrigants in human root canals.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Lili Guo; Yuqin Li; Xiangjun Guo; Bin Wang; Ligeng Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Endodontic Irrigants against Enterococcus Faecalis and Escherichia Coli: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Noopur Kaushik; Usha Rehani; Abhay Agarwal; Mayur Kaushik; Vivek Adlakha
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2013-10-14

6.  Antibacterial and Toxic Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide Combined with Different Concentrations of Chlorhexidine in Comparison with Sodium Hypochlorite.

Authors:  Hosein Mirhadi; Abbas Abbaszadegan; Mohammad Ali Ranjbar; Mohammad Reza Azar; Bita Geramizadeh; Shima Torabi; Zeinab Sadat Aleyasin; Ahmad Gholami
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-12

7.  Effects of Diode Laser, Gaseous Ozone, and Medical Dressings on Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms in the Root Canal Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Kerstin Bitter; Alexander Vlassakidis; Mediha Niepel; Daniela Hoedke; Julia Schulze; Konrad Neumann; Annette Moter; Jörn Noetzel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Analysis of Demineralized Chemical Substances for Disinfecting Gutta-percha Cones.

Authors:  George Táccio de Miranda Candeiro; Eduardo Akisue; Fabrícia Campelo Correia; Edmilson Dos Santos Sousa; Mônica Sampaio do Vale; Elaine Faga Iglecias; Giulio Gavini
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.