Literature DB >> 12964468

Getting it right the second time.

Gabriel Szulanski1, Sidney Winter.   

Abstract

Once a business performs a complex activity well, the parent organization often wants to replicate that success. But doing that is surprisingly difficult, and businesses nearly always fail when they try to reproduce a best practice. The reason? People approaching best-practice replication are overly optimistic and overconfident. They try to perfect an operation that's running nearly flawlessly, or they try to piece together different practices to create the perfect hybrid. Getting it right the second time (and all the times after that) involves adjusting for overconfidence in your own abilities and imposing strict discipline on the process and the organization. The authors studied numerous business settings to find out how organizational routines were successfully reproduced, and they identified five steps for successful replication. First, make sure you've got something that can be copied and that's worth copying. Some processes don't lend themselves to duplication; others can be copied but maybe shouldn't be. Second, work from a single template. It provides proof success, performance measurements, a tactical approach, and a reference for when problems arise. Third, copy the example exactly, and fourth, make changes only after you achieve acceptable results. The people who developed the template have probably already encountered many of the problems you want to "fix," so it's best to create a working system before you introduce changes. Fifth, don't throw away the template. If your copy doesn't work, you can use the template to identify and solve problems. Best-practice replication, while less glamorous than pure innovation, contributes enormously to the bottom line of most companies. The article's examples--Banc One, Rank Xerox, Intel, Starbucks, and Re/Max Israel--prove that exact copying is a non-trivial, challenging accomplishment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12964468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  6 in total

1.  Learning from Kaiser (part 2). Is integration the answer?

Authors:  David Jewell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  How prevention curricula are taught under real-world conditions: Types of and reasons for teacher curriculum adaptations.

Authors:  Michelle Miller-Day; Jonathan Pettigrew; Michael L Hecht; YoungJu Shin; John Graham; Janice Krieger
Journal:  Health Educ (Lond)       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Sources or sinks? The responses of tropical forests to current and future climate and atmospheric composition.

Authors:  Deborah A Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Practical Steps for Practice Transfer: The Four A's of Adoption.

Authors:  Hannah King; Karen Tallman; Arthur K Huberman
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2005

5.  Rapid spread of complex change: a case study in inpatient palliative care.

Authors:  Richard Della Penna; Helene Martel; Esther B Neuwirth; Jennifer Rice; Marta I Filipski; Jennifer Green; Jim Bellows
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The Prevention and Reactivation Care Program: intervention fidelity matters.

Authors:  Annemarie J B M de Vos; Ton Jem Bakker; Paul L de Vreede; Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan P Mackenbach; Anna P Nieboer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.