Literature DB >> 12963748

The utility of MRI in suspected MS: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

E M Frohman1, D S Goodin, P A Calabresi, J R Corboy, P K Coyle, M Filippi, J A Frank, S L Galetta, R I Grossman, K Hawker, N J Kachuck, M C Levin, J T Phillips, M K Racke, V M Rivera, W H Stuart.   

Abstract

Advancements in imaging technologies and newly evolving treatments offer the promise of more effective management strategies for MS. Until recently, confirmation of the diagnosis of MS has generally required the demonstration of clinical activity that is disseminated in both time and space. Nevertheless, with the advent of MRI techniques, occult disease activity can be demonstrated in 50 to 80% of patients at the time of the first clinical presentation. Prospective studies have shown that the presence of such lesions predicts future conversion to clinically definite (CD) MS. Indeed, in a young to middle-aged adult with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), once alternative diagnoses are excluded at baseline, the finding of three or more white matter lesions on a T2-weighted MRI scan (especially if one of these lesions is located in the periventricular region) is a very sensitive predictor (>80%) of the subsequent development of CDMS within the next 7 to 10 years. Moreover, the presence of two or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions at baseline and the appearance of either new T2 lesions or new Gd enhancement on follow-up scans are also highly predictive of the subsequent development of CDMS in the near term. By contrast, normal results on MRI at the time of clinical presentation makes the future development of CDMS considerably less likely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12963748     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000082654.99838.ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  32 in total

1.  Does high-field MR imaging have an influence on the classification of patients with clinically isolated syndromes according to current diagnostic mr imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  M P Wattjes; M Harzheim; C K Kuhl; J Gieseke; S Schmidt; L Klotz; T Klockgether; H H Schild; G G Lutterbey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Higher sensitivity in the detection of inflammatory brain lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis using high field MRI: an intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T with 3.0 T.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Götz G Lutterbey; Michael Harzheim; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Luisa Klotz; Thomas Klockgether; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Multiple sclerosis: new insights and trends.

Authors:  M Inglese
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  [Revision of McDonald's new diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  H Wiendl; B C Kieseier; R Gold; R Hohlfeld; M Bendszus; H-P Hartung
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  T J Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

6.  Standardized MR imaging protocol for multiple sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers consensus guidelines.

Authors:  J H Simon; D Li; A Traboulsee; P K Coyle; D L Arnold; F Barkhof; J A Frank; R Grossman; D W Paty; E W Radue; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Optical coherence tomography: a window into the mechanisms of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Elliot M Frohman; James G Fujimoto; Teresa C Frohman; Peter A Calabresi; Gary Cutter; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Neurol       Date:  2008-12

Review 8.  Uhthoff's phenomena in MS--clinical features and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Teresa C Frohman; Scott L Davis; Shin Beh; Benjamin M Greenberg; Gina Remington; Elliot M Frohman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  A proposed roadmap for inpatient neurology quality indicators.

Authors:  Vanja C Douglas; S Andrew Josephson
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2011-01

10.  FLAIR imaging for multiple sclerosis: a comparative MR study at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Rainald Bachmann; Ralf Reilmann; Wolfram Schwindt; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel; Stefan Krämer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.