Literature DB >> 12963207

Pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage: an effective therapy.

Claire L Buchanan1, Vita V Sullivan, Richard Lampman, Mohan G Kulkarni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most effective method for managing pericardial effusions has yet to be identified. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of echocardiographic-guided placement of indwelling catheters into the pericardial space.
METHODS: This study consists of a 5-year retrospective chart review of consecutive patients coded with benign or malignant pericardial effusions who presented for drainage procedures to a single surgeon at a 260-bed hospital. Complication, recurrence, and survival rates were studied.
RESULTS: Between January 1996 and August 2001, a total of 29 pericardial drainage procedures were performed; eight of those also underwent talc sclerosis. Mean follow-up was 16 months. Three patients (10%) required conversion to thoracotomy; of those remaining, 25 of the 26 procedures were performed under local anesthesia with intravenous sedation. The identified etiologies for pericardial effusions were malignancy (76%), idiopathic (14%), postcoronary artery bypass grafting procedure (3%), viral pericarditis (3%), and uremia (3%). Echocardiographic features of tamponade were documented in 72%. Mean +/- SEM length of postprocedure in-hospital stay was 6.7 +/- 0.82 days. The overall complication rate was 10% (pneumothorax and cardiac injury). Recurrence rate within 30 days was 7%. Thirty-day mortality was 21%, and more than 90-day survival was 72%.
CONCLUSIONS: Pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage is a safe treatment for management of clinically significant, malignant and benign, pericardial effusions and can be performed effectively under local anesthesia with intravenous sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12963207     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00666-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Subxiphoid pericardiostomy in the management of pericardial effusions: case series analysis of 368 patients.

Authors:  N Becit; Y Unlü; M Ceviz; C U Koçogullari; H Koçak; Y Gürlertop
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Pericardial Drain Placement in Interventional Radiology: An Overview.

Authors:  Josi L Herren; HingKui Chan; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

3.  Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion.

Authors:  Danielle El Haddad; Cezar Iliescu; Syed Wamique Yusuf; William Nassib William; Tarif H Khair; Juhee Song; Elie N Mouhayar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Mediastinoscope-controlled parasternal fenestration of the pericardium: definitive surgical palliation of malignant pericardial effusion.

Authors:  Imre Toth; Geza Szucs; Tamas F Molnar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Pneumopericardium as a complication of pericardiocentesis.

Authors:  Woo Hyung Choi; You Mi Hwang; Mi Youn Park; Seung Jae Lee; Hye Yeon Lee; Sei Won Kim; Byoung Yeon Jun; Jin Soo Min; Woo Seung Shin; Jong Min Lee; Yoon Seok Koh; Hui-Kyung Jeon; Wook Sung Chung; Ki-Bae Seung
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  The Unusual Journey of a Pericardial Drainage Catheter in Pentalogy of Cantrell.

Authors:  Margaret P Ivy; Gareth J Morgan; Jenny E Zablah
Journal:  Case Rep Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-08

7.  Complications of pericardiocentesis: A clinical synopsis.

Authors:  Rajan Kumar; Archana Sinha; Maggie J Lin; Reina Uchino; Tracy Butryn; M Shay O'Mara; Sudip Nanda; Jamshid Shirani; Stanislaw P Stawicki
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.