Literature DB >> 12962902

Symptom assessment in elderly cancer patients receiving palliative care.

Sophie Pautex1, André Berger, Catherine Chatelain, François Herrmann, Gilbert B Zulian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to examine the concordance of symptom assessment among the multiple raters in French-speaking elderly patients with an advanced cancer benefiting from palliative care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in a geriatric hospital with palliative care specificity. During 6 months, patient, nurse and physician completed the Edmonton symptom assessment system on two consecutive days.
RESULTS: 42 patients with an advanced oncological disease were included. Mean age was 72+/-9.04 (range 52-88) and 23 were females. Mean mini mental status examination (MMSE) was 27.5+/-1.6. First assessment was completed at a median of day 8 after admission. Nurses, physicians and patients assessments were reproducible between days 1 and 2 (P>0.05). Pearson correlation coefficient significantly associated nurse assessment with patient assessment for pain, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite and wellbeing (P<0.05). Physician assessment was associated with patient assessment for pain, depression, drowsiness, appetite, wellbeing and shortness of breath (P<0.05). However, regression analysis looking for patient score from both physicians and nurses scores weakly correlated all these factors (R2<0.6), except for appetite (R2 for day 1/day 2: 0.79/0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: French-speaking elderly cancer patients without cognitive failure and in stable general condition are consistent in their symptom assessment, and they have to be considered as the gold standard. Nevertheless, interdisciplinary assessment is probably a valid surrogate to self-assessment by the patient but only when the latter is truly impossible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12962902     DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(03)00043-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  17 in total

Review 1.  Older adults and cancer treatment.

Authors:  Barbara Given; Charles W Given
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments.

Authors:  David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Screening for distress in patients with cancer: methodologic considerations.

Authors:  A Feldstain; C Tomei; M Bélanger; S Lebel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  The psychometric properties of cancer multisymptom assessment instruments: a clinical review.

Authors:  Aynur Aktas; Declan Walsh; Jordanka Kirkova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in Korean patients with cancer.

Authors:  Jung Hye Kwon; Seung-Hyun Nam; Sujin Koh; Young Seon Hong; Kyung Hee Lee; Sang-Won Shin; David Hui; Kyun Woo Park; So Young Yoon; Ji Yun Won; Gary Chisholm; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  The Edmonton symptom assessment system--what do patients think?

Authors:  Sharon Watanabe; Cheryl Nekolaichuk; Crystal Beaumont; Asifa Mawani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Associations between baseline symptom burden as assessed by patient-reported outcomes and overall survival of patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Atul Batra; Lin Yang; Devon J Boyne; Andrew Harper; Winson Y Cheung; Colleen A Cuthbert
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) as a screening tool for depression and anxiety in non-advanced patients with solid or haematological malignancies on cure or follow-up.

Authors:  Carla I Ripamonti; Elena Bandieri; Maria Adelaide Pessi; Alice Maruelli; Loredana Buonaccorso; Guido Miccinesi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.

Authors:  L A Richardson; G W Jones
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Lung cancer symptoms and pulse oximetry in the prognostic assessment of patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Sandro J Martins; Nelson Ho; Sueli O Cavamura; Cecilia M Harada; Crystina A Yamamoto; Teresa Y Takagaki
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.