OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the living kidney donation (LKD) process using donors' opinions on the impact on social, emotional, and financial aspects affecting donor quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2000 to December 2002, we studied 22 donors of living kidneys at the Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain, who completed an anonymous survey 6 months after donation. RESULTS: Most donors (86%) had themselves informed the recipient about their wish to donate, the other 14% were asked by family members. Eighty-eight percent stated that the information provided to the donor about the evaluation process was well explained and understood whereas 12% disagreed with the statement. At the time of thin decision, 90.5% of donors understood the vital risk. For 95%, the explanations about the process corresponded with the actual experience. One hundred percent of donors stated after donation that they would again favor it. Mean hospital stay was 6 days (range, 3-9 days). Those donors with a labor contract have been out of work for an average of 57.8 days (range, 18 days to 6 months). Twenty-five percent of donors admitted financial effects as a result of donation. All but 1 felt completely recovered with the same quality of life after donation. DISCUSSION: LKD is a good therapeutic alternative. Some aspects should be developed, such as more information about living donation and the need to considering donors as healthy persons without loss of earnings. Recognition of the benefits of living donation requires more wide participation of all citizens nationally.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the living kidney donation (LKD) process using donors' opinions on the impact on social, emotional, and financial aspects affecting donor quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2000 to December 2002, we studied 22 donors of living kidneys at the Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain, who completed an anonymous survey 6 months after donation. RESULTS: Most donors (86%) had themselves informed the recipient about their wish to donate, the other 14% were asked by family members. Eighty-eight percent stated that the information provided to the donor about the evaluation process was well explained and understood whereas 12% disagreed with the statement. At the time of thin decision, 90.5% of donors understood the vital risk. For 95%, the explanations about the process corresponded with the actual experience. One hundred percent of donors stated after donation that they would again favor it. Mean hospital stay was 6 days (range, 3-9 days). Those donors with a labor contract have been out of work for an average of 57.8 days (range, 18 days to 6 months). Twenty-five percent of donors admitted financial effects as a result of donation. All but 1 felt completely recovered with the same quality of life after donation. DISCUSSION: LKD is a good therapeutic alternative. Some aspects should be developed, such as more information about living donation and the need to considering donors as healthy persons without loss of earnings. Recognition of the benefits of living donation requires more wide participation of all citizens nationally.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health
Authors: Ami M Parekh; Elisa J Gordon; Amit X Garg; Amy D Waterman; Sanjay Kulkarni; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2008-07-03 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Steven Habbous; Justin Woo; Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Matthew Cooper; Marian Reich; Amit X Garg Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2018-09-20
Authors: Dana H Z Robinson; Christina P C Borba; Nancy J Thompson; Jennie P Perryman; Kimberly R Jacob Arriola Journal: Prog Transplant Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 1.065