Literature DB >> 12960861

Volume maintenance of inlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton.

Andrew H Rosenthal1, Steven R Buchman.   

Abstract

Although the clinical use of inlay bone grafts is widespread in craniofacial surgery, the dynamics of inlay bone grafting to the craniofacial skeleton have never been well characterized. Previous work demonstrated that volume maintenance of bone grafts in the onlay position is a consequence of their microarchitectural features, rather than their embryological origins. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the properties determining the volume maintenance of bone grafts in the onlay position in the craniofacial skeleton could be extended to bone grafts in the inlay position. It was hypothesized that volume maintenance of an inlay bone graft could be better explained on the basis of the microarchitectural features of the graft (cortical versus cancellous composition), rather than its embryological origin (membranous versus endochondral), and that the primary determinant of bone graft behavior is the interaction between the microarchitectural features of the bone graft and the local mechanical environment in which the bone graft is placed. Cortical and cancellous bone grafts were harvested from the iliac crest (endochondral origin) of 25 New Zealand white rabbits, and cortical bone was harvested from the mandible (membranous origin) of each rabbit. Four 7-mm trephine holes were made in the cranium of each rabbit, posterior to the coronal suture. Each defect was filled with endochondral cortical bone, endochondral cancellous bone, or membranous cortical bone or was left as an ungrafted control specimen. Animals were killed at 3, 8, or 16 weeks. Crania were subjected to micro-computed tomographic and histological assessments. Micro-computed tomographic analysis demonstrated significant increases in actual bone volume from time 0 to the time of death for all types of grafts. Cortical bone demonstrated significant increases in space-occupying volume at all time points. By 16 weeks, no statistically significant difference in either the actual bone volume or the space-occupying volume according to graft type could be detected. There was no resorption of the inlay bone grafts; in fact, all bone types exhibited increased volume. Cancellous bone demonstrated the greatest capacity to increase actual bone volume. All bone graft types seemed to reach a steady-state bone volume, as if controlled by a local regulator. The regulator is likely the local mechanical environment in which the grafts were placed, as corroborated by the findings that the bone grafts seemed to recapitulate the characteristics of the bone in which they were placed, rather than maintaining their native characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12960861     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000069713.62687.F5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Craniofacial Bone Grafting: Wolff's Law Revisited.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Lawrence Tong; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2008-11

2.  Bone Morphogenetic Protein-9-Stimulated Adipocyte-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitors Entrapped in a Thermoresponsive Nanocomposite Scaffold Facilitate Cranial Defect Repair.

Authors:  Cody S Lee; Elliot S Bishop; Zari Dumanian; Chen Zhao; Dongzhe Song; Fugui Zhang; Yunxiao Zhu; Guillermo A Ameer; Tong-Chuan He; Russell R Reid
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  * Tissue Engineering Strategies to Improve Osteogenesis in the Juvenile Swine Alveolar Cleft Model.

Authors:  Montserrat Caballero; Donna C Jones; Zhengyuan Shan; Sajjad Soleimani; John A van Aalst
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Juvenile Swine Surgical Alveolar Cleft Model to Test Novel Autologous Stem Cell Therapies.

Authors:  Montserrat Caballero; Justin C Morse; Alexandra E Halevi; Omri Emodi; Michael R Pharaon; Jeyhan S Wood; John A van Aalst
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.056

5.  Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques.

Authors:  Seckin Aydin; Baris Kucukyuruk; Bashar Abuzayed; Sabri Aydin; Galip Zihni Sanus
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2011-07

6.  Stem cells, growth factors and scaffolds in craniofacial regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Viktor Tollemar; Zach J Collier; Maryam K Mohammed; Michael J Lee; Guillermo A Ameer; Russell R Reid
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2015-10-17

7.  Volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft with mandibular body bone: cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction analysis.

Authors:  Hyeong-Geun Lee; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-20

8.  Polydopamine-Laced Biomimetic Material Stimulation of Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Promote Osteogenic Effects.

Authors:  Dong Joon Lee; Yan-Ting Lee; Rui Zou; Renie Daniel; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Rat model of an autologous cancellous bone graft.

Authors:  Tomo Hamada; Hidenori Matsubara; Toshifumi Hikichi; Kanu Shimokawa; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Combating Constraints of the Functional Matrix: The Importance of Overcorrection in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas T K Do; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.