Literature DB >> 12960787

Laparoscopic pancreatic cystogastrostomy.

Robert J Obermeyer1, William E Fisher, Jihad R Salameh, Manjula Jeyapalan, John F Sweeney, F Charles Brunicardi.   

Abstract

The purpose of the review was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic cystogastrostomy for operative drainage of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreatic cystogastrostomy between June 1997 and July 2001 was performed. Data regarding etiology of pancreatitis, size of pseudocyst, operative time, complications, and pseudocyst recurrence were collected and reported as median values with ranges. Laparoscopic pancreatic cystogastrostomy was attempted in 6 patients. Pseudocyst etiology included gallstone pancreatitis (3), alcohol-induced pancreatitis (2), and post-ERCP pancreatitis (1). The cystogastrostomy was successfully performed laparoscopically in 5 of 6 patients. However, the procedure was converted to open after creation of the cystgastrostomy in 1 of these patients. There were no complications in the cases completed laparoscopically and no deaths in the entire group. No pseudocyst recurrences were observed with a median followup of 44 months (range 4-59 months). Laparoscopic pancreatic cystgastrostomy is a feasible surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with a resultant low pseudocyst recurrence rate, length of stay, and low morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12960787     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200308000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  7 in total

1.  Open cystogastrostomy, retroperitoneal drainage, and G-J enteral tube for complex pancreatitis-associated pseudocyst: 19 patients with no recurrence.

Authors:  Cherif Boutros; Ponandai Somasundar; N Joseph Espat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Stapled laparoscopic cystgastrostomy: a series with 15 cases.

Authors:  A Hindmarsh; M P N Lewis; M Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas in progress.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Gleydson Cesar-Borges; Miguel Angel López-Boado; David Orduña; Salvador Navarro
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Criteria for Laparoscopic Advanced Surgery in Semi-Equipped Setup (CLASS): Feasibility Study Based on Institutional Experience.

Authors:  S K Uday; P R K Bhargav; C H Venkata Pavan Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 5.  Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series.

Authors:  M Aljarabah; B J Ammori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection?

Authors:  Markus M Lerch; Albrecht Stier; Ulrich Wahnschaffe; Julia Mayerle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Surgical therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Kevin E Behrns; Kfir Ben-David
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.