Literature DB >> 12959874

Decline in learning ability best predicts future dementia type: the Freedom House Study.

Donald R Royall1, Raymond Palmer, Laura K Chiodo, Marsha J Polk.   

Abstract

The authors studied longitudinal change in learning efficiency as a predictor of future dementia type among healthy, well-educated, noninstitutionalized elderly retirees. Serial assessments of memory were obtained using the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). Latent growth (LG) models were developed from the slopes of the subjects' performance over the first five CVLT learning trials at each of three serial administrations (e.g., cohort inception [i.e., baseline] [CVLT1], 18 months [CVLT2] and 36 months [CVLT3]). The resulting growth curves were incorporated into a higher order LG model representing the dynamic change in learning efficiency over time (DeltaCVLT). DeltaCVLT was used to predict each subject's "dementia type" (i.e., clinical state) at 36 months (e.g., no dementia, Type 1 [Alzheimer type] dementia or Type 2 [non-Alzheimer type] dementia), after adjusting for CVLT1, baseline age, and baseline dementia type. Nonlinear (logarithmic) LG models of CVLT1-CVLT3 and DeltaCVLT best fit the data. There was significant variability about both CVLT1 and DeltaCVLT, suggesting subgroups in the sample with significantly different baseline memory function, and different rates of deterioration in learning efficiency. Age, baseline dementia type, and DeltaCVLT made significant independent contributions to final dementia type. CVLT1 did not predict final dementia type independently of the other covariates. These data suggest that baseline memory performance in noninstitutionalized elderly retirees does not predict future dementia type independently of the dynamic rate of change in memory measures. Serial administrations of memory tests may help identify nondemented persons at greater or lesser risk for conversion to frank dementia in the near-term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12959874     DOI: 10.1080/03610730303700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  6 in total

1.  A growth curve model of learning acquisition among cognitively normal older adults.

Authors:  Richard N Jones; Adrienne L Rosenberg; John N Morris; Jason C Allaire; Karin J M McCoy; Michael Marsiske; Ken P Kleinman; George W Rebok; Paul F Malloy
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Correlates of individual, and age-related, differences in short-term learning.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zhang; Hasker P Davis; Timothy A Salthouse; Elliot M Tucker-Drob
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2007-07-01

3.  Modeling learning and memory using verbal learning tests: results from ACTIVE.

Authors:  Alden L Gross; George W Rebok; Jason Brandt; Doug Tommet; Michael Marsiske; Richard N Jones
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Subjective cognitive complaints and longitudinal changes in memory and brain function.

Authors:  Timothy J Hohman; Lori L Beason-Held; Melissa Lamar; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  JointMMCC: joint maximum-margin classification and clustering of imaging data.

Authors:  Roman Filipovych; Susan M Resnick; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Evaluating verbal learning and memory in patients with an at-risk mental state or first episode psychosis using structural equation modelling.

Authors:  Laura Egloff; Erich Studerus; Ronan Zimmermann; Ulrike Heitz; Stephanie Menghini-Müller; Sarah Ittig; Katharina Beck; Christina Andreou; Stefan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.