Literature DB >> 12959830

Selection of ecologic covariates in the American Cancer Society study.

Alette Willis1, Daniel Krewski, Michael Jerrett, Mark S Goldberg, Richard T Burnett.   

Abstract

The American Cancer Society (ACS) Study of the effects of long-term exposure to ambient air pollution on mortality used metropolitan areas to assign exposures to individual cohort members (Pope et al., 1995); these authors did not, however, control for any other place-specific variables in their analysis. Consequently, the study has been criticized on the basis that the association observed between air pollution and mortality may be confounded by other unmeasured ecologic covariates. To address this criticism, the reanalysis team selected a set of place-specific variables that measured determinants of health ranging from the biophysical environment to the social environment and the healthcare system. This article outlines the process by which place-specific ecologic covariates were selected; data measuring these variables were obtained and geographic boundaries for places were delineated. Issues involved in obtaining and using geographically based ecological data are examined within the context of the reanalysis of the ACS study. Both the ecological fallacy and the atomistic fallacy are addressed and an argument is made for the importance of studying the effects of place-specific variables that are integral or contextual in nature. Issues relating to the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) are explored with reference to using ZIP codes and data from a variety of sources. It is argued that differences in the geographical scale of variability for various pollutants may prove to be the key to distinguishing between their relative impacts on health and that multilevel analyses are essential for understanding the impact of social and environmental determinants of health. A number of determinants of health are then briefly examined in terms of their association with mortality, the appropriateness of their being measured at the metropolitan scale, and the availability of data for the 1980s from U.S. sources. Finally, the article presents the database of place-specific ecologic covariates that was incorporated into the ACS models during the reanalysis in order to account for the influence that place may have above and beyond ambient air pollution.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12959830     DOI: 10.1080/15287390306425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  5 in total

1.  Mortality from heart, respiratory, and kidney disease in coal mining areas of Appalachia.

Authors:  Michael Hendryx
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status modifies the association between individual smoking status and PAH-DNA adduct levels in prostate tissue.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Catherine Richards; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Deliang Tang; Benjamin A Rybicki
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Long-term ozone exposure and mortality.

Authors:  Michael Jerrett; Richard T Burnett; C Arden Pope; Kazuhiko Ito; George Thurston; Daniel Krewski; Yuanli Shi; Eugenia Calle; Michael Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Geography of non-melanoma skin cancer and ecological associations with environmental risk factors in England.

Authors:  B W Wheeler; G Kothencz; A S Pollard
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Cluster of liver cancer and immigration: a geographic analysis of incidence data for Ontario 1998-2002.

Authors:  Yue Chen; Qilong Yi; Yang Mao
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.918

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.