Literature DB >> 12959667

Local interactions in neural networks explain global effects in Gestalt processing and masking.

Michael H Herzog1, Udo A Ernst, Axel Etzold, Christian W Eurich.   

Abstract

One of the fundamental and puzzling questions in vision research is how objects are segmented from their backgrounds and how object formation evolves in time. The recently discovered shine-through effect allows one to study object segmentation and object formation of a masked target depending on the spatiotemporal Gestalt of the masking stimulus (Herzog & Koch, 2001). In the shine-through effect, a vernier (two abutting lines) precedes a grating for a very short time. For small gratings, the vernier remains invisible while it regains visibility as a shine-through element for extended and homogeneous gratings. However, even subtle deviations from the homogeneity of the grating diminish or even abolish shine-through. At first glance, these results suggest that explanations of these effects have to rely on high-level Gestalt terminology such as homogeneity rather than on low-level properties such as luminance (Herzog, Fahle, & Koch, 2001). Here, we show that a simple neural network model of the Wilson-Cowan type qualitatively and quantitatively explains the basic effects in the shine-through paradigm, although the model does not contain any explicit, global Gestalt processing. Visibility of the target vernier corresponds to transient activation of neural populations resulting from the dynamics of local lateral interactions of excitatory and inhibitory layers of neural populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12959667     DOI: 10.1162/089976603322297304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  18 in total

1.  Long lasting effects of unmasking in a feature fusion paradigm.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Frank Scharnowski; Frouke Hermens
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

2.  AI, visual imagery, and a case study on the challenges posed by human intelligence tests.

Authors:  Maithilee Kunda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Masking reduces orientation selectivity in rat visual cortex.

Authors:  Dasuni S Alwis; Katrina L Richards; Nicholas S C Price
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual backward masking: Modeling spatial and temporal aspects.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Udo Ernst
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

5.  The role of feedback in visual masking and visual processing.

Authors:  Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

6.  Spatial processing and visual backward masking.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

7.  Sensorimotor supremacy: Investigating conscious and unconscious vision by masked priming.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Odmar Neumann; Stefanie I Becker; Holger Kälberer; Holk Cruse
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

8.  The mechanisms of feature inheritance as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention and decision making.

Authors:  Fred H Hamker
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

9.  What should a quantitative model of masking look like and why would we want it?

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

10.  Schizophrenia and visual backward masking: a general deficit of target enhancement.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Maya Roinishvili; Eka Chkonia; Andreas Brand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.