OBJECTIVE: To determine if a high compliance rate for wearing external hip protectors could be achieved and sustained in a long-term care population. STUDY DESIGN: A 13-month prospective study of daytime use of external hip protectors in an at-risk long-term care population. SETTING: One hundred-bed not-for-profit long-term care facility. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight ambulatory residents having at least 1 of 4 risk factors (osteoporosis, recent fall, positive fall screen, previous fracture). INTERVENTION: The rehabilitation department coordinated an implementation program. Members of the rehabilitation team met with eligible participants, primary caregivers, families, and other support staff for educational instruction and a description of the program. The rehabilitation team assumed overall responsibility for measuring and ordering hip protectors and monitoring compliance. RESULTS: By the end of the third month, hip protector compliance averaged greater than 90% daily wear. The average number of falls per month in the hip protector group was 3.9 versus 1.3 in nonparticipants. Estimated total indirect staff time was 7.75 hours. The total cost of the study (hip protectors and indirect staff time) was 6,300 US dollars. CONCLUSIONS: High hip protector compliance is both feasible and sustainable in an at-risk long-term care population. Achieving high compliance requires an interdisciplinary approach with one department acting as a champion. The cost of protectors could be a barrier to widespread use. Facilities might be unable to cover the cost until the product is paid for by third-party payers.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a high compliance rate for wearing external hip protectors could be achieved and sustained in a long-term care population. STUDY DESIGN: A 13-month prospective study of daytime use of external hip protectors in an at-risk long-term care population. SETTING: One hundred-bed not-for-profit long-term care facility. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight ambulatory residents having at least 1 of 4 risk factors (osteoporosis, recent fall, positive fall screen, previous fracture). INTERVENTION: The rehabilitation department coordinated an implementation program. Members of the rehabilitation team met with eligible participants, primary caregivers, families, and other support staff for educational instruction and a description of the program. The rehabilitation team assumed overall responsibility for measuring and ordering hip protectors and monitoring compliance. RESULTS: By the end of the third month, hip protector compliance averaged greater than 90% daily wear. The average number of falls per month in the hip protector group was 3.9 versus 1.3 in nonparticipants. Estimated total indirect staff time was 7.75 hours. The total cost of the study (hip protectors and indirect staff time) was 6,300 US dollars. CONCLUSIONS: High hip protector compliance is both feasible and sustainable in an at-risk long-term care population. Achieving high compliance requires an interdisciplinary approach with one department acting as a champion. The cost of protectors could be a barrier to widespread use. Facilities might be unable to cover the cost until the product is paid for by third-party payers.
Authors: Anna M Sawka; Madeline Nixon; Lora Giangregorio; Lehana Thabane; Jonathan D Adachi; Amiram Gafni; Ron Goeree; Parminder Raina; Jennifer Ranford; Alexandra Papaioannou Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2007-04-18 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: I D Cameron; S Kurrle; S Quine; P Sambrook; L March; D Chan; J Stocks; K Lockwood; B Cook; F G Schaafsma Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Jay Magaziner; Stanley J Birge; Bruce A Barton; Shari S Kronsberg; Douglas P Kiel Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Sarah E Carter; James K Richardson; Sibylle Thies; Trina DeMott; James A Ashton-Miller Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: A M Sawka; A Gafni; P Boulos; K Beattie; A Papaioannou; A Cranney; D A Hanley; J D Adachi; A Cheung; E A Papadimitropoulos; L Thabane Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2007-01-13 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Alexandra M B Korall; Judith Godin; Fabio Feldman; Ian D Cameron; Pet-Ming Leung; Joanie Sims-Gould; Stephen N Robinovitch Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 3.921