Literature DB >> 12959651

Hip protector compliance: a 13-month study on factors and cost in a long-term care facility.

Jeffrey B Burl1, James Centola, Alice Bonner, Colleen Burque.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a high compliance rate for wearing external hip protectors could be achieved and sustained in a long-term care population. STUDY
DESIGN: A 13-month prospective study of daytime use of external hip protectors in an at-risk long-term care population.
SETTING: One hundred-bed not-for-profit long-term care facility. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight ambulatory residents having at least 1 of 4 risk factors (osteoporosis, recent fall, positive fall screen, previous fracture). INTERVENTION: The rehabilitation department coordinated an implementation program. Members of the rehabilitation team met with eligible participants, primary caregivers, families, and other support staff for educational instruction and a description of the program. The rehabilitation team assumed overall responsibility for measuring and ordering hip protectors and monitoring compliance.
RESULTS: By the end of the third month, hip protector compliance averaged greater than 90% daily wear. The average number of falls per month in the hip protector group was 3.9 versus 1.3 in nonparticipants. Estimated total indirect staff time was 7.75 hours. The total cost of the study (hip protectors and indirect staff time) was 6,300 US dollars.
CONCLUSIONS: High hip protector compliance is both feasible and sustainable in an at-risk long-term care population. Achieving high compliance requires an interdisciplinary approach with one department acting as a champion. The cost of protectors could be a barrier to widespread use. Facilities might be unable to cover the cost until the product is paid for by third-party payers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12959651     DOI: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000083382.28795.9B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  8 in total

1.  Autonomy, choice, patient-centered care, and hip protectors: the experience of residents and staff in long-term care.

Authors:  Joanie Sims-Gould; Heather A McKay; Fabio Feldman; Victoria Scott; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-06-11

2.  The use of hip protectors in long-term care facilities: a survey of nursing home staff.

Authors:  Anna M Sawka; Madeline Nixon; Lora Giangregorio; Lehana Thabane; Jonathan D Adachi; Amiram Gafni; Ron Goeree; Parminder Raina; Jennifer Ranford; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 4.669

3.  Increasing adherence with the use of hip protectors for older people living in the community.

Authors:  I D Cameron; S Kurrle; S Quine; P Sambrook; L March; D Chan; J Stocks; K Lockwood; B Cook; F G Schaafsma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Adherence to hip protectors and implications for U.S. long-term care settings.

Authors:  Sheryl Zimmerman; Jay Magaziner; Stanley J Birge; Bruce A Barton; Shari S Kronsberg; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  The relationship between frontal plane gait variability and ankle range of motion in middle-aged and older persons with neuropathy.

Authors:  Sarah E Carter; James K Richardson; Sibylle Thies; Trina DeMott; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  Could a policy of provision of hip protectors to elderly nursing home residents result in cost savings in acute hip fracture care? The case of Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  A M Sawka; A Gafni; P Boulos; K Beattie; A Papaioannou; A Cranney; D A Hanley; J D Adachi; A Cheung; E A Papadimitropoulos; L Thabane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Alexandra M B Korall; Judith Godin; Fabio Feldman; Ian D Cameron; Pet-Ming Leung; Joanie Sims-Gould; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Nonpharmacological prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Cathy R Kessenich
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.