Alex G Garza1, Matthew C Gratton, John J Chen, Brent Carlson. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Truman Medical Center, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. alex.garza@tmcmed.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the accuracy of paramedic emergency medical services (EMS) dispatchers in predicting cardiac arrest and to assess the effect of the caller party on dispatcher accuracy in an advanced life support, public utility model EMS system, with greater than 90,000 calls and greater than 60,000 transports per year. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2000, of 911 calls with dispatcher-assigned presumptive patient condition (PPC) or field diagnosis of cardiac arrest. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the PPC code for cardiac arrest by calling parties were calculated. Homogeneity of sensitivity and PPV of the PPC code for cardiac arrest by calling parties was studied with chi-square analysis. Relevant proportions, relative risk ratios, and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Student's t-test was used to compare quality assurance scores between calling parties. RESULTS: There were 506 patients included in the study. Overall sensitivity for dispatcher-assigned PPC of cardiac arrest was 68.3% (95% CI = 63.3% to 73.0%) with a PPV of 65.0% (95% CI = 60.0% to 69.7%). There was a significant difference in the PPV for the EMS dispatcher diagnosis of cardiac arrest depending on the type of caller (chi(2) = 17.34, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher level of medical training may improve dispatch accuracy for predicting cardiac arrest. The type of calling party influenced the PPV of dispatcher-assigned condition.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the accuracy of paramedic emergency medical services (EMS) dispatchers in predicting cardiac arrest and to assess the effect of the caller party on dispatcher accuracy in an advanced life support, public utility model EMS system, with greater than 90,000 calls and greater than 60,000 transports per year. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2000, of 911 calls with dispatcher-assigned presumptive patient condition (PPC) or field diagnosis of cardiac arrest. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the PPC code for cardiac arrest by calling parties were calculated. Homogeneity of sensitivity and PPV of the PPC code for cardiac arrest by calling parties was studied with chi-square analysis. Relevant proportions, relative risk ratios, and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Student's t-test was used to compare quality assurance scores between calling parties. RESULTS: There were 506 patients included in the study. Overall sensitivity for dispatcher-assigned PPC of cardiac arrest was 68.3% (95% CI = 63.3% to 73.0%) with a PPV of 65.0% (95% CI = 60.0% to 69.7%). There was a significant difference in the PPV for the EMS dispatcher diagnosis of cardiac arrest depending on the type of caller (chi(2) = 17.34, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher level of medical training may improve dispatch accuracy for predicting cardiac arrest. The type of calling party influenced the PPV of dispatcher-assigned condition.
Authors: Caroline L Watkins; Stephanie P Jones; Margaret A Hurley; Valerio Benedetto; Christopher I Price; Christopher J Sutton; Tom Quinn; Munirah Bangee; Brigit Chesworth; Colette Miller; Dawn Doran; Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena; Josephine M E Gibson Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Christian Vaillancourt; Jan L Jensen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Jamie C Brehaut; Manya Charette; Ann Kasaboski; Martin Osmond; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2009-07-31
Authors: Theresa M Olasveengen; Mary E Mancini; Gavin D Perkins; Suzanne Avis; Steven Brooks; Maaret Castrén; Sung Phil Chung; Julie Considine; Keith Couper; Raffo Escalante; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Kevin K C Hung; Peter Kudenchuk; Swee Han Lim; Chika Nishiyama; Giuseppe Ristagno; Federico Semeraro; Christopher M Smith; Michael A Smyth; Christian Vaillancourt; Jerry P Nolan; Mary Fran Hazinski; Peter T Morley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Pamela V C Hiltunen; Tom O Silfvast; T Helena Jäntti; Markku J Kuisma; Jouni O Kurola Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: Renee Y Hsia; Delphine Huang; N Clay Mann; Christopher Colwell; Mary P Mercer; Mengtao Dai; Matthew J Niedzwiecki Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-11-02