Literature DB >> 12957261

Long-term outcomes after external beam irradiation and brachytherapy boost for base-of-tongue cancers.

Iris C Gibbs1, Quynh-Thu Le, Rachit D Shah, David J Terris, Willard E Fee, Don R Goffinet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess long-term efficacy and toxicity associated with external beam irradiation (EBRT) and interstitial (192)Ir implantation for the treatment of squamous carcinoma of the base of tongue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1975 and December 1993, 41 patients with base-of-tongue carcinomas were treated with (192)Ir interstitial implants after EBRT at Stanford University. One patient had Stage I, 6 had Stage II, 7 had Stage III, and 27 had Stage IV tumors. Twenty-eight patients had cervical lymph node involvement at diagnosis. All received EBRT to a median dose of 50 Gy (range 48.9-68 Gy) to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes before brachytherapy. Interstitial implant was performed 2-4 weeks after EBRT. Intraoperatively, nylon catheters were placed via steel trocars into the base of tongue, glossotonsillar groove, and pharyngo-epiglottic fold using a catheter looping technique. Twenty-three of 28 node-positive patients also underwent simultaneous neck dissections. Postoperatively, the (192)Ir seeds were inserted and allowed to remain in place for approximately 35 h to achieve a median tumor dose of 26 Gy (range 20-34 Gy) to a median volume of 73 cc. Survival, local control, and complications were assessed.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 62 months (range 9-215) for all patients and 90 months for alive patients, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 66%. The 5-year local control rate was 82%, with 7 patients recurring locally, 2 of whom were salvaged with surgery. Nodal control was achieved in 93% of patients with either EBRT alone or in combination with neck dissection. The 5-year freedom from distant metastasis rate was 83%. Acute complications included transient bleeding (5%) and infection (8%). Late complication included soft-tissue necrosis/ulceration (7%), osteoradionecrosis (5%), and xerostomia.
CONCLUSION: Base-of-tongue carcinoma can be effectively treated with EBRT and (192)Ir implant boost. Local control is excellent and complication rates are acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12957261     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00597-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Fascio-cutaneous-free flaps as primary reconstruction in salvage total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Cesare Piazza; Alberto Paderno; Francesca Del Bon; Alberto Grammatica; Nausica Montalto; Lorenzo Bresciani; Lorenzo Giannini; Fabiola Incandela; Walter Fontanella; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Osteoradionecrosis in cancer patients: the evidence base for treatment-dependent frequency, current management strategies, and future studies.

Authors:  Douglas E Peterson; Wolfgang Doerr; Allan Hovan; Andres Pinto; Debbie Saunders; Linda S Elting; Fred K L Spijkervet; Michael T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Clinical research on the treatment effects of radioactive (125)I seeds interstitial brachytherapy on children with primary orbital rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Xin Ge; Jianmin Ma; Haojie Dai; Ling Ren; Quan Li; Jitong Shi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Benign ulceration as a manifestation of soft tissue radiation necrosis: imaging findings.

Authors:  J M Debnam; A S Garden; L E Ginsberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Imaging of the Head and Neck following Radiation Treatment.

Authors:  J Matthew Debnam
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-05-11

6.  Clinical outcomes associated with evolving treatment modalities and radiation techniques for base-of-tongue carcinoma: thirty years of institutional experience.

Authors:  Leechuan Andy Chen; Christopher J Anker; Jason P Hunt; Luke O Buchmann; Kenneth F Grossmann; Kenneth Boucher; Li-Ming Christine Fang; Dennis C Shrieve; Ying J Hitchcock
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  Modern head and neck brachytherapy: from radium towards intensity modulated interventional brachytherapy.

Authors:  György Kovács
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-12-31

8.  Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy as the boost in combination with external beam irradiation in base of tongue cancer. Long-term results from a uniform clinical series.

Authors:  Bengt Johansson; Leif Karlsson; Johan Reizenstein; Mathias von Beckerath; Lennart Hardell; Jan Persliden
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-03-31

9.  High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in head and neck cancer: do we need a look back into a forgotten art - a single institute experience.

Authors:  Rajendra Bhalavat; Manish Chandra; Vibhay Pareek; Lalitha Nellore; Karishma George; P Nandakumar; Pratibha Bauskar
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-04-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.