Literature DB >> 12956540

Beyond the group mind: a quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect.

Tim Wildschut1, Brad Pinter, Jack L Vevea, Chester A Insko, John Schopler.   

Abstract

This quantitative review of 130 comparisons of interindividual and intergroup interactions in the context of mixed-motive situations reveals that intergroup interactions are generally more competitive than interindividual interactions. The authors identify 4 moderators of this interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect, each based on the theoretical perspective that the discontinuity effect flows from greater fear and greed in intergroup relative to interindividual interactions. Results reveal that each moderator shares a unique association with the magnitude of the discontinuity effect. The discontinuity effect is larger when (a) participants interact with an opponent whose behavior is unconstrained by the experimenter or constrained by the experimenter to be cooperative rather than constrained by the experimenter to be reciprocal, (b) group members make a group decision rather than individual decisions, (c) unconstrained communication between participants is present rather than absent, and (d) conflict of interest is severe rather than mild.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12956540     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  21 in total

1.  Competitive interaction leads to perceptual distancing between actors.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Christopher C Davoli; James R Brockmole
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The neurobiology of human social behaviour: an important but neglected topic.

Authors:  Simon N Young
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  Group discussion improves lie detection.

Authors:  Nadav Klein; Nicholas Epley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  In-group defense, out-group aggression, and coordination failures in intergroup conflict.

Authors:  Carsten K W De Dreu; Jörg Gross; Zsombor Méder; Michael Giffin; Eliska Prochazkova; Jonathan Krikeb; Simon Columbus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Shared responsibility in collective decisions.

Authors:  Marwa El Zein; Bahador Bahrami; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-04-22

6.  University Sports Rivalries Provide Insights on Coalitional Psychology : Territorial Context Influences Reactions to Vocal Signals of Allegiance.

Authors:  Daniel J Kruger; Michael Falbo; Sophie Blanchard; Ethan Cole; Camille Gazoul; Noreen Nader; Shannon Murphy
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2018-09

7.  Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses.

Authors:  M Cikara; E Bruneau; J J Van Bavel; R Saxe
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-11-01

8.  Oxytocin motivates non-cooperation in intergroup conflict to protect vulnerable in-group members.

Authors:  Carsten K W De Dreu; Shaul Shalvi; Lindred L Greer; Gerben A Van Kleef; Michel J J Handgraaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  In intergroup conflict, self-sacrifice is stronger among pro-social individuals, and parochial altruism emerges especially among cognitively taxed individuals.

Authors:  Carsten K W De Dreu; D Berno Dussel; Femke S Ten Velden
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-06

10.  Testosterone response to competition in males is unrelated to opponent familiarity or threat appraisal.

Authors:  Gonçalo A Oliveira; Sara Uceda; Tânia F Oliveira; Alexandre C Fernandes; Teresa Garcia-Marques; Rui F Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.