Literature DB >> 12956193

Discrepancies in volume calculations between different radiotherapy treatment planning systems.

T Ackerly1, J Andrews, D Ball, M Guerrieri, B Healy, I Williams.   

Abstract

It has been determined that, contrary to expectation, there is a clinically significant variation in the volume calculations of different RTPS (Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System) for identical contours. The situation was investigated prior to a multi-centre trial to determine whether tumour volume is an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) and included four of the commercially available RTPS. The four RTPS tested were, Theraplan Plus V3.0, Cadplan V6.2, Focus V2.6 and ADAC V3.0. Five randomly chosen clinical target related volumes (3 GTVs, one PTV and one CTV) from the trial database originally marked on the Cadplan system were transferred to the other four systems and the resulting volumes were calculated. It was found that Cadplan consistently underestimated the volume relative to the other three systems by 6-12%. This systematic underestimation was found to be caused by different assumptions made by the Cadplan system about the axial outer slice extension of the volume. Cadplan truncates the volume, while the other three systems extrapolate it by half the slice thickness at each end. A short program was written to apply the same method of volume extension to the Cadplan volume that is utilised by the other systems. This produced calculated volumes that were within +/- 1.0% of the average of the volumes calculated by the other three planning systems, and the maximum deviation from the average for any planning system was then reduced to 1.5%. This program was implemented at all participating trial centres utilising Cadplan, thus reducing the intersystem variability to a negligible factor in comparison to the estimates of inter-physician variation. This unexpected finding has significant implications for the validity of multi-centre trials using dose volume histograms, and indeed the adoption of any clinical protocol employing dose volume histogram constraints derived from experience at another centre employing a different RTPS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12956193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  4 in total

1.  Dependence of volume calculation and margin growth accuracy on treatment planning systems for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  David J Eaton; Kevin Alty
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Contouring variations and the role of atlas in non-small cell lung cancer radiation therapy: Analysis of a multi-institutional preclinical trial planning study.

Authors:  Yunfeng Cui; Wenzhou Chen; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Lindsey A Olsen; Ronald E Beatty; Peter G Maxim; Timothy Ritter; Jason W Sohn; Jane Higgins; James M Galvin; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30

3.  Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology-guided radiotherapy machine.

Authors:  Eric Simiele; Dante Capaldi; Dylan Breitkreutz; Bin Han; Timothy Yeung; John White; Daniel Zaks; Michael Owens; Srinath Maganti; Lei Xing; Murat Surucu; Nataliya Kovalchuk
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 2.243

4.  Modeling and dosimetric performance evaluation of the RayStation treatment planning system.

Authors:  Bongile Mzenda; Koki V Mugabe; Rick Sims; Guy Godwin; Dayan Loria
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.