Literature DB >> 12955608

Outcome of the Graf ligamentoplasty procedure compared with anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the Hartshill horseshoe cage.

Sanjeev Madan1, Nicholas R Boeree.   

Abstract

The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of Graf ligamentoplasty in comparison with rigid fixation and fusion with the Hartshill horseshoe cage for similar severity of disc degeneration. Although studies have been done on the Graf ligamentoplasty procedure and the Hartshill horseshoe cage, their efficacy has never been compared in any study. This study was done to decide whether retaining mobility and stabilizing the spine is best or stiffening the lumbar segment by fusion is preferable. Between 1995 and 1997, a prospective randomized study was performed comparing Graf ligament stabilization and anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Twenty-eight patients had single-level Graf ligaments inserted and 27 patients had single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with a Hartshill horseshoe cage and tricortical iliac crest autograft. The two groups were similar in age, sex, symptoms, severity of the disc degeneration, and duration of follow-up. The chi-square test and t-test were used to evaluate the outcome. At a minimum follow-up of 2.1 years, we found that 93% of patients who had undergone Graf ligamentoplasty had a satisfactory outcome (rated "excellent" or "better") compared to 77.8% of patients who had been treated with ALIF with Hartshill horseshoe cage stabilization and fusion, when measured on the Oswestry Disability Index ( P<0.05). Retaining mobility in the lumbar segments gives better results after stabilisation with Graf ligaments than rigid fixation and fusion with the Hartshill horseshoe cage in the short term. We will be watching this cohort of patients over the next few years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955608      PMCID: PMC3467791          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0488-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Re: The graf ligamentoplasty procedure. Comparison with posterolateral fusion in the management of low-back pain.

Authors:  A Gardner; G M Declerck; P Hardcastle; T M Markwalder; M S Moon; C Salanova; Y S Shim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  ANTERIOR DISC EXCISION AND FUSION OF THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAL BODIES. A REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC LEVEL TESTING, WITH OPERATIVE RESULTS IN MORE THAN SEVEN HUNDRED CASES.

Authors:  P H HARMON
Journal:  J Int Coll Surg       Date:  1963-12

3.  Magnetic resonance study of disc degeneration in young low-back pain patients.

Authors:  H Paajanen; M Erkintalo; T Kuusela; S Dahlstrom; M Kormano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions.

Authors:  J A Turner; M Ersek; L Herron; J Haselkorn; D Kent; M A Ciol; R Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Transperitoneal Approach to the Intervertebral Disc in the Lumbar Area.

Authors:  J D Lane; E S Moore
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1948-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Anterior discectomy and interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation. A review of 350 cases.

Authors:  S Inoue; T Watanabe; A Hirose; T Tanaka; N Matsui; O Saegusa; E Sho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The Graf ligamentoplasty procedure. Comparison with posterolateral fusion in the management of low back pain.

Authors:  S V Hadlow; A B Fagan; T M Hillier; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Anterior fusion of the lumbar spine. End-result study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J C Flynn; M A Hoque
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ).

Authors:  C J Main
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.006

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Zhonghan Wang; Yang Wang; Zuhao Li; Bo Chao; Shixian Liu; Wangwang Luo; Jianhang Jiao; Minfei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons.

Authors:  Hassan Serhan; Devdatt Mhatre; Henri Defossez; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  Soft stabilization with an artificial intervertebral ligament in grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Chan Shik Shim; Sang-Ho Lee; Sun-Hee Park; Ji-Hee Whang
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-08-01

Review 5.  Low Back Pain: Current Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Santosh Baliga; Katrina Treon; Niall John Angus Craig
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-07-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.