Literature DB >> 12955441

[Determination of the concentration distribution of macular pigment from reflection and fluorescence images].

M Hammer1, D Schweitzer, L Leistritz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The macular pigment xanthophyll protects the macula in two ways: firstly, it absorbs hazardous blue light and secondly, it acts as a radical scavenger. A low concentration of xanthophyll may be regarded as a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Therefore, we investigated a simple method to determine the xanthophyll concentration at the fundus which is suitable for patient screening.
METHOD: The local distribution of xanthophyll density was determined from monochromatic blue reflection images and autofluorescence images of the fundus in 18 healthy volunteers (mean age: 23.9 years). The significance of the parameters maximal, global, and mean concentration were compared.
RESULTS: The maximal optical density of xanthophyll determined from reflection images was found to be 0.29+/-0.08 (mean for all test persons) which is in good agreement with literature data. The total xanthophyll concentration which is proportional to the maximal density, appeared to be appropriate to describe a person's overall xanthophyll status. Because of the low intensity of autofluorescence images, these are less useful for the determination of the xanthophyll concentration.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of it's simplicity, the determination of xanthophyll concentration as described here can be performed by every ophthalmologist using a fundus camera and is, therefore, suitable as a screening method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955441     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-002-0782-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  14 in total

1.  [Objective determination of optical density of xanthophyll after supplementation of lutein].

Authors:  D Schweitzer; G E Lang; B Beuermann; H Remsch; M Hammer; E Thamm; C W Spraul; G K Lang
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Review: antioxidant protection of the ageing macula.

Authors:  H Gerster
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Human macular pigment assessed by imaging fundus reflectometry.

Authors:  P E Kilbride; K R Alexander; M Fishman; G A Fishman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Foveal cone photopigment distribution: small alterations associated with macular pigment distribution.

Authors:  A E Elsner; S A Burns; E Beausencourt; J J Weiter
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Solar radiation and age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  R W Young
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Spectral reflectance of the human eye.

Authors:  D Van Norren; L F Tiemeijer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Analysis of the macular pigment by HPLC: retinal distribution and age study.

Authors:  R A Bone; J T Landrum; L Fernandez; S L Tarsis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Spectral reflectance of the human ocular fundus.

Authors:  F C Delori; K P Pflibsen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 9.  Vitamins and carotenoids--a promising approach to reducing the risk of coronary heart disease, cancer and eye diseases.

Authors:  W Schalch; P Weber
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Fruits and vegetables that are sources for lutein and zeaxanthin: the macular pigment in human eyes.

Authors:  O Sommerburg; J E Keunen; A C Bird; F J van Kuijk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Classification of biomedical research reports as a reference for evidence-based medicine in ophthalmology. A survey considering as example the journal Der Ophthalmologe].

Authors:  H P N Scholl; M Fleckenstein; T U Krohne; F G Holz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Influence of macular oedema on the measurement of macular pigment optical density.

Authors:  Simone Thiele; Franziska Georgia Rauscher; Peter Wiedemann; Jens Dawczynski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Nonmydriatic fluorescence-based quantitative imaging of human macular pigment distributions.

Authors:  Mohsen Sharifzadeh; Paul S Bernstein; Werner Gellermann
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Comparison of macular pigment optical density in patients with dry and wet age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Ayhan Ozyurt; Nilufer Kocak; Pınar Akan; Ozlem Gursoy Calan; Taylan Ozturk; Mahmut Kaya; Eyup Karahan; Suleyman Kaynak
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.