Literature DB >> 12955334

Quantitative ultrasound of the hand phalanges in patients with genetic disorders: a pilot case-control study.

W Pluskiewicz1, A Pyrkosz, B Drozdzowska, Z Halaba.   

Abstract

Skeletal status in subjects with genetic disorders rarely has been a matter of interest, and the risk for osteoporotic fracture in this population is not known. The aim of this study was to estimate ultrasound values in subjects with genetic disorders. In the study 50 patients (36 boys and 14 girls, mean age 11.8 +/- 2.9 years) and 528 healthy controls matched for age and body size (380 boys and 148 girls, mean age 11.9 +/- 2.5 years) were evaluated. Patients with the following disorders were included: Down syndrome, Martin-Bell syndrome, Marfan-Mass phenotype and others. Bone status was assessed by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of hand phalanges using DBM Sonic 1200 (IGEA, Carpi, Italy), which measures amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SoS, m/s). Ad-SoS was significantly lower in patients than in controls (in the whole group 1,915 +/- 69 m/s vs. 1,970 +/- 62.0 m/s, P<0.0000001; in males 1,917 +/- 73 m/s vs. 1,972 +/- 63 m/s, P<0.000001; in females 1,910 +/- 58 m/s vs. 1,963 +/- 58 m/s, P<0.01). Ad-SoS correlated significantly with age and body size (except for Ad-SoS with age in female patients). In all subgroups of patients (except for the subjects with Marfan-Mass syndrome) Ad-SoS values were significantly lower than in controls. In a multiple, stepwise regression analysis of Ad-SoS on age and body size, in the whole group of patients age and height had significant influence on Ad-SoS, and in controls age, height and weight. In conclusion, the study shows significantly lower phalangeal ultrasound values in subjects with different genetic disorders compared to normal healthy persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955334     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1400-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  17 in total

1.  Bone mineral density in adults with Down's syndrome.

Authors:  N Angelopoulou; V Souftas; A Sakadamis; K Mandroukas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Reference curve and diagnostic sensitivity for a new ultrasound device for the phalanges [correction of phalanages], the DBMsonic 1200, in Belgian women.

Authors:  J Joly; R Westhovens; H Borghs; H Peeters; J Tirry; J Nijs; J Dequeker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Monitoring bone effect of transdermal hormone replacement therapy by ultrasound investigation at the phalanx: a four-year follow-up study.

Authors:  M Mauloni; L C Rovati; R Cadossi; F de Terlizzi; V Ventura; D de Aloysio
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  The assessment of development of bone mass in children by quantitative ultrasound through the proximal phalanxes of the hand.

Authors:  Z Halaba; W Pluskiewicz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Ultrasound measurement of proximal phalanges in a normal Polish female population.

Authors:  W Pluskiewicz; B Drozdzowska
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of ultrasound measurements at the heel between adults with mental retardation and control subjects.

Authors:  T J Aspray; R M Francis; A Thompson; S J Quilliam; D J Rawlings; S P Tyrer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Seizure-related injuries in multihandicapped patients with therapy-resistant epilepsy.

Authors:  K O Nakken; R Lossius
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  F E Alenfeld; C Wüster; C Funck; J F Pereira-Lima; T Fritz; P J Meeder; R Ziegler
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone mineral density in children with Down's syndrome detected by dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  C H Kao; C C Chen; S J Wang; S H Yeh
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.690

10.  How well do radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound predict osteoporosis at spine or hip? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  K Lippuner; G Fuchs; A G Ruetsche; R Perrelet; J P Casez; I Neto
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.