Literature DB >> 12955159

Does pulsatile and sustained neck pressure or neck suction produce differential cardiovascular and sympathetic responses in humans?

Shigehiko Ogoh1, Paul J Fadel, Janelle M Hardisty, Wendy L Wasmund, David M Keller, Peter B Raven, Michael L Smith.   

Abstract

Although square-wave sustained and R wave-triggered pulsatile stimuli have been used to assess carotid baroreflex (CBR) function in humans, it remains unclear whether these different stimulus protocols elicit comparable responses and whether CBR responses adapt during prolonged stimulation. Thus, we measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in response to +30 Torr neck pressure (NP) and -30 Torr neck suction (NS) delivered for 20 s either as a sustained or pulsatile stimulus. CBR-mediated changes in MSNA, HR and MAP were similar with sustained and pulsatile stimuli. The time course of MSNA and HR responses identified that significant changes occurred during the initial 5 s and were better maintained over 20 s with NP than with NS. Changes in MAP exhibited a slower onset with the peak increase during NP occurring at 10 s (sustained, 7 +/- 1 mmHg; pulsatile, 7 +/- 1 mmHg; P > 0.05) and the nadir during NS occurring at 20 s (sustained, -7 +/- 1 mmHg; pulsatile, -9 +/- 2 mmHg; P > 0.05). These data demonstrate that sustained and pulsatile NP and NS produce comparable CBR-mediated responses. Furthermore, despite MSNA and HR returning towards baseline during NS, CBR-mediated changes in MAP are well maintained over 20 s of NS and NP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955159     DOI: 10.1113/eph8802586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  9 in total

1.  Direct stimulation of the autonomic nervous system modulates activity of the brain at rest and when engaged in a cognitive task.

Authors:  Barbara Basile; Andrea Bassi; Giovanni Calcagnini; Stefano Strano; Carlo Caltagirone; Emiliano Macaluso; Pietro Cortelli; Marco Bozzali
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Whole-body heating slows carotid baroreflex response in human subjects.

Authors:  Fumio Yamazaki; Ryoko Sone
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Increases in central blood volume modulate carotid baroreflex resetting during dynamic exercise in humans.

Authors:  Shigehiko Ogoh; James P Fisher; Paul J Fadel; Peter B Raven
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Carotid baroreflex responsiveness is impaired in normotensive African American men.

Authors:  Seth W Holwerda; Diana Fulton; Wendy L Eubank; David M Keller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Sympathetically mediated increases in cardiac output, not restraint of peripheral vasodilation, contribute to blood pressure maintenance during hyperinsulinemia.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Limberg; James A Smith; Rogerio N Soares; Jennifer L Harper; Keeley N Houghton; Dain W Jacob; Michael T Mozer; Zachary I Grunewald; Blair D Johnson; Timothy B Curry; Tracy Baynard; Camila Manrique-Acevedo; Jaume Padilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Evidence for the emergence of leg sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone with age in healthy women.

Authors:  David J Moore; Matthew A Barlow; Joaquin U Gonzales; Cheri L McGowan; James A Pawelczyk; David N Proctor
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-01-27

7.  Carotid baroreflex responsiveness in normotensive African Americans is attenuated at rest and during dynamic leg exercise.

Authors:  Seth W Holwerda; Mitchel R Samels; David M Keller
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Can human cardiovascular regulation during exercise be learnt from feedback from arterial baroreceptors?

Authors:  Mari Herigstad; George M Balanos; Peter A Robbins
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Influence of a neck compression collar on cerebrovascular and autonomic function in men and women.

Authors:  Hitesh Joshi; Loriann M Hynes; Heather Edgell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.