Literature DB >> 12953825

Results of long-term follow-up for transanal excision for rectal cancer.

Quintin H Gonzalez1, Martin J Heslin, Gregg Shore, Selwyn M Vickers, Marshall M Urist, Kirby I Bland.   

Abstract

Low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection are the surgical techniques used most frequently in the treatment of rectal cancer. It is our hypothesis that selected patients with early T stage, well or moderate grade of differentiation, and small tumor size are good candidates for transanal excision in terms of minimal morbidity, low recurrence rate, and sphincter preservation. From January 1993 until August 2001 30 patients underwent transanal excision; three patients were excluded because they had histology other than adenocarcinoma. Factors analyzed included those related to the patient [age (years), gender, race, body mass index, and anal tone], tumor [size (cm), distance from the anal verge (cm), differentiation, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage], and additional treatment. Median follow-up of the group was 40.7 months (range 0.6-99) and the primary end points were local and distant recurrence. Data are presented as mean (range). The median age of the group was 58.9 years (range 27-94); 52 per cent were female and 48 per cent were male. The mean body mass index was 25.9 (range 22.7-36.7). Preoperatively 81, 11, and 4 per cent of the patients had stage I, II, and III/IV cancer, respectively. Preoperative size of the tumor was 2.0 cm (1-3 cm), and distance from the anal verge was 5.0 cm (3-15 cm). Blood loss was 50 cm3 (5-200 cm3), and there were no operative complications. Tumor differentiation levels were well (37%) and moderate (63%). All patients had negative margins. Additional treatment consisted of radiation therapy in seven patients (six postoperative and one preoperative). Chemotherapy was given to seven patients (six postoperative and one preoperative). The local recurrence rate was 7.4 per cent (two patients), and 3.7 per cent recurred distantly (one patient). Transanal excision of low rectal cancer in selected patients is an acceptable alternative to formal resection. Important selection criteria include early T stage, well or moderate differentiation, relatively small tumor size, and negative microscopic margins. The roles of radiation and chemotherapy remain controversial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12953825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

1.  Transanal Endoscopic Operation Versus Conventional Transanal Excision for Rectal Tumors: Case-Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Jeonghee Han; Gyoung Tae Noh; Chinock Cheong; Min Soo Cho; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery?

Authors:  David J Bentrem; Satoshi Okabe; W Douglas Wong; Jose G Guillem; Martin R Weiser; Larissa K Temple; Leah S Ben-Porat; Bruce D Minsky; Alfred M Cohen; Philip B Paty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Submucosal infiltration and local recurrence in pT1 low-risk rectal cancer treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery].

Authors:  H Schäfer; S E Baldus; F Gasper; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS): safety and feasibility for the resection of benign and malignant lesions of the rectum.

Authors:  Asif Mehraj; Najmus Saqib; Rauf Wani; Nisar Chowdri; Fazl Parray; Mudassir Khan
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2021-03-22

5.  Outcomes of Local Excision plus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with T1 Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Suzuki; Sotaro Sadahiro; Akira Tanaka; Kazutake Okada; Gota Saito; Hiroshi Miyakita; Takeshi Akiba; Hiroshi Yamamuro
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Optimising surgical management of elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Hodigere Sripathy Jois Ramesh; Daniel Pope; Roberto Gennari; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 7.  Rectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli; Mohammad Reza Keramati
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-01-31

8.  Sphincter preservation in distal CT2N0 rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Nir Wasserberg; Yulia Kundel; Ofer Purim; Andrei Keidar; Hanoch Kashtan; Eran Sadot; Eyal Fenig; Baruch Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Local recurrence after local excision of early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of completion TME, adjuvant (chemo)radiation, or no additional treatment.

Authors:  S E van Oostendorp; L J H Smits; Y Vroom; R Detering; M W Heymans; L M G Moons; P J Tanis; E J R de Graaf; C Cunningham; Q Denost; M Kusters; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.939

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.