Literature DB >> 12953787

Differences among eight inbred strains of mice in motor ability and motor learning on a rotorod.

M P McFadyen1, G Kusek, V J Bolivar, L Flaherty.   

Abstract

The rotorod is commonly used to assess motor ability in mice. We examined a number of inbred strains to determine whether there is genetic variability in rotorod performance and motor learning. Mice received three trials per day for three days in a modified accelerating rotorod paradigm, and active rotation performance was calculated for each day. Male and female 129S1/SvlmJ, A/J, BALB/cByJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, CBA/J, DBA/2J and FVB/NJ mice were tested. Strain and sex differences were observed in motor performance. Motor learning also differed across strains, as some strains showed an improvement in performance over the three days while other strains did not. In certain strains the weight and body length of the mouse correlated with rotorod performance. The role of vision in motor performance on the rotorod was assessed by a comparison of C3H/HeJ mice (with retinal degeneration) and congenic C3A.BLiA-Pde6b+ (Pdeb+) mice (without retinal degeneration). The sight-impaired C3H mice stayed on the rotorod longer than did their sighted Pdeb+ partners, although both strains improved across days. Thus, we have demonstrated a genetic component in rotorod performance, and we have shown that factors other than inherent motor ability can contribute to rotorod performance in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12953787     DOI: 10.1034/j.1601-183x.2003.00028.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  64 in total

1.  Behavioral and genetic investigations of low exploratory behavior in Il18r1(-/-) mice: we can't always blame it on the targeted gene.

Authors:  Amy F Eisener-Dorman; David A Lawrence; Valerie J Bolivar
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 7.217

2.  Calibration of rotational acceleration for the rotarod test of rodent motor coordination.

Authors:  Martin Bohlen; Andy Cameron; Pamela Metten; John C Crabbe; Douglas Wahlsten
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study.

Authors:  Silvia Mandillo; Valter Tucci; Sabine M Hölter; Hamid Meziane; Mumna Al Banchaabouchi; Magdalena Kallnik; Heena V Lad; Patrick M Nolan; Abdel-Mouttalib Ouagazzal; Emma L Coghill; Karin Gale; Elisabetta Golini; Sylvie Jacquot; Wojtek Krezel; Andy Parker; Fabrice Riet; Ilka Schneider; Daniela Marazziti; Johan Auwerx; Steve D M Brown; Pierre Chambon; Nadia Rosenthal; Glauco Tocchini-Valentini; Wolfgang Wurst
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Characterization of behavioral and neuromuscular junction phenotypes in a novel allelic series of SMA mouse models.

Authors:  Melissa Osborne; Daniel Gomez; Zhihua Feng; Corissa McEwen; Jose Beltran; Kim Cirillo; Bassem El-Khodor; Ming-Yi Lin; Yun Li; Wendy M Knowlton; David D McKemy; Laurent Bogdanik; Katherine Butts-Dehm; Kimberly Martens; Crystal Davis; Rosalinda Doty; Keegan Wardwell; Afshin Ghavami; Dione Kobayashi; Chien-Ping Ko; Sylvie Ramboz; Cathleen Lutz
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Serine 421 regulates mutant huntingtin toxicity and clearance in mice.

Authors:  Ian H Kratter; Hengameh Zahed; Alice Lau; Andrey S Tsvetkov; Aaron C Daub; Kurt F Weiberth; Xiaofeng Gu; Frédéric Saudou; Sandrine Humbert; X William Yang; Alex Osmand; Joan S Steffan; Eliezer Masliah; Steven Finkbeiner
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Cautionary insights on knockout mouse studies: the gene or not the gene?

Authors:  Amy F Eisener-Dorman; David A Lawrence; Valerie J Bolivar
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 7.217

7.  Deletion of the Chd6 exon 12 affects motor coordination.

Authors:  Melissa J Lathrop; Lisa Chakrabarti; Jeremiah Eng; C Harker Rhodes; Thomas Lutz; Amelia Nieto; H Denny Liggitt; Sandra Warner; Jennifer Fields; Reinhard Stöger; Steven Fiering
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Using the Tools of Behavioral Neuroscience to Determine the Identity of Different Mouse Strains in a Laboratory Course.

Authors:  Janine M Wotton; Michael J Ferragamo
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

9.  Metabolic abnormalities and hypoleptinemia in α-synuclein A53T mutant mice.

Authors:  Sarah M Rothman; Kathleen J Griffioen; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard G Spencer; Sokratis Makrogiannis; Wei-Na Cong; Bronwen Martin; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Over-expression of a human chromosome 22q11.2 segment including TXNRD2, COMT and ARVCF developmentally affects incentive learning and working memory in mice.

Authors:  Go Suzuki; Kathryn M Harper; Takeshi Hiramoto; Birgit Funke; MoonSook Lee; Gina Kang; Mahalah Buell; Mark A Geyer; Raju Kucherlapati; Bernice Morrow; Pekka T Männistö; Soh Agatsuma; Noboru Hiroi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.