Literature DB >> 12953343

Chronopharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: occurrence of acute rejection.

Hitoshi Tada1, Sigeru Satoh, Masahiro Iinuma, Naotake Shimoda, Miho Murakami, Yukitoshi Hayase, Tetsuro Kato, Toshio Suzuki.   

Abstract

The circadian variation of clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus was studied using 16 adult renal transplant recipients 1 month after the operation. The recipients were administered tacrolimus twice a day (9 a.m. and 9 p.m.), and whole-blood samples were obtained just prior to and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours after oral administration. Histological specimens of transplant kidney were collected by an allograft core biopsy on day 28 after the transplantation. There were no circadian changes in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12) (214 ng.h/mL during daytime vs. 223 ng.h/mL during nighttime) resulting from morning and night doses. A slight delay in mean residence time (MRT0-12) and time to the peak concentration (tmax) was found after night doses, but there was no statistical significance. Three patients (18.8%) had a clinical acute rejection (AR) episode 4 to 6 weeks after transplantation, and AUC0-12 at nighttime was significantly lower (18.4% on average) in patients with AR in comparison to those without AR. There was no statistical significance in maximum concentration (Cmax) or morning/night trough levels between patients with and without AR. In regard to the correlation between tacrolimus concentrations in each sampling time and AUC0-12, the morning trough concentrations were less predictable for daytime AUC0-12 (r2 = 0.125), but there was a weak correlation to nighttime AUC0-12 (r2 = 0.424). Tacrolimus concentrations at 2, 3, and 6 hours after the morning dose (C2, C3, and C6) had a good correlation against daytime AUC. The results of this study indicate that the variance on the clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus between daytime and nighttime in renal transplant patients is not significant, while the lower nighttime AUC corresponded to the occurrence of AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12953343     DOI: 10.1177/0091270003254797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of limited sampling methods for estimation of tacrolimus exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Katherine A Barraclough; Nicole M Isbel; Carl M Kirkpatrick; Katie J Lee; Paul J Taylor; David W Johnson; Scott B Campbell; Diana R Leary; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  CYP3A5 *1 allele associated with tacrolimus trough concentrations but not subclinical acute rejection or chronic allograft nephropathy in Japanese renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Shigeru Satoh; Mitsuru Saito; Takamitsu Inoue; Hideaki Kagaya; Masatomo Miura; Kazuyuki Inoue; Atsushi Komatsuda; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Toshio Suzuki; Tomonori Habuchi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus: are the formulations truly equivalent?

Authors:  Katherine A Barraclough; Nicole M Isbel; David W Johnson; Scott B Campbell; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Chronopharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and tacrolimus.

Authors:  Massimo Baraldo; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic-pharmacogenetic analysis and Bayesian estimation in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Khaled Benkali; Aurelie Prémaud; Nicolas Picard; Jean-Philippe Rérolle; Olivier Toupance; Guillaume Hoizey; Alain Turcant; Florence Villemain; Yannick Le Meur; Pierre Marquet; Annick Rousseau
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Evaluation of tacrolimus abbreviated area-under-the-curve monitoring in renal transplant patients who are potentially at risk for adverse events.

Authors:  Yuen Yi Hon; Christine E Chamberlain; David E Kleiner; Michael S Ring; Douglas A Hale; Allan D Kirk; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Lack of tacrolimus circadian pharmacokinetics and CYP3A5 pharmacogenetics in the early and maintenance stages in Japanese renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Shigeru Satoh; Hideaki Kagaya; Mitsuru Saito; Takamitsu Inoue; Masatomo Miura; Kazuyuki Inoue; Kazuyuki Numakura; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Hitoshi Tada; Toshio Suzuki; Tomonori Habuchi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Influence of the Circadian Timing System on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics After Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Pere Fontova; Helena Colom; Raül Rigo-Bonnin; Lisanne N van Merendonk; Anna Vidal-Alabró; Nuria Montero; Edoardo Melilli; Maria Meneghini; Anna Manonelles; Josep M Cruzado; Juan Torras; Josep Maria Grinyó; Oriol Bestard; Nuria Lloberas
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Population Pharmacokinetic Model Characterizing 24-Hour Variation in the Pharmacokinetics of Oral and Intravenous Midazolam in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  A van Rongen; L Kervezee; Mje Brill; H van Meir; J den Hartigh; H-J Guchelaar; J H Meijer; J Burggraaf; F van Oosterhout
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-24

10.  High tacrolimus intra-patient variability is associated with graft rejection, and de novo donor-specific antibodies occurrence after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Arnaud Del Bello; Nicolas Congy-Jolivet; Marie Danjoux; Fabrice Muscari; Laurence Lavayssière; Laure Esposito; Anne-Laure Hebral; Julie Bellière; Nassim Kamar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.