Literature DB >> 12952710

The reliability of digital images when used to assess burn wounds.

O C Jones1, D I Wilson, S Andrews.   

Abstract

Sixty burn wounds were assessed in person. The same observer later assessed them using digital images of different sizes. The file sizes tested were 2.25, 5.5 and 9 MByte per image. There was good agreement between the diagnoses of burn depth made using the digital images and those made in person, with kappa scores of 0.53-0.60. There were no major differences between the three file sizes. The assessments made of the partial-thickness burns showed a lower rate of agreement between the in-person and the digital image assessments and for these burns the 2.25 MByte images were apparently as good or better than the larger images. There was little difference between the three file sizes in terms of observer confidence, usefulness of the location shot, or perceived image quality. There was no significant advantage in using larger file sizes to assess burn wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12952710     DOI: 10.1258/135763303322196213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  8 in total

Review 1.  State of the art in burn treatment.

Authors:  Bishara S Atiyeh; S William Gunn; Shady N Hayek
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Telemedicine and burns: an overview.

Authors:  B Atiyeh; S A Dibo; H H Janom
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 3.  Imaging Techniques for Clinical Burn Assessment with a Focus on Multispectral Imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Thatcher; John J Squiers; Stephen C Kanick; Darlene R King; Yang Lu; Yulin Wang; Rachit Mohan; Eric W Sellke; J Michael DiMaio
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Clinical decision-support for acute burn referral and triage at specialized centres - Contribution from routine and digital health tools.

Authors:  Constance Boissin
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2022-12-31       Impact factor: 2.996

5.  Use of standardized, quantitative digital photography in a multicenter Web-based study.

Authors:  Joseph A Molnar; Wesley K Lew; Derek A Rapp; E Stanley Gordon; Denise Voignier; Scott Rushing; William Willner
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-01-12

6.  Modalities for the assessment of burn wound depth.

Authors:  Lara Devgan; Satyanarayan Bhat; S Aylward; Robert J Spence
Journal:  J Burns Wounds       Date:  2006-02-15

7.  Prevalence and severity of abscesses and cellulitis, and their associations with other health outcomes, in a community-based study of people who inject drugs in London, UK.

Authors:  Talen Wright; Vivian Hope; Daniel Ciccarone; Dan Lewer; Jenny Scott; Magdalena Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Combined reflectance confocal microscopy/optical coherence tomography imaging for skin burn assessment.

Authors:  Nicusor Iftimia; R Daniel Ferguson; Mircea Mujat; Ankit H Patel; Ellen Ziyi Zhang; William Fox; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.732

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.