Literature DB >> 12950964

Economic evaluation and 1-year survival analysis of MARS in patients with alcoholic liver disease.

Franz P Hessel1, Steffen R Mitzner, Jana Rief, Britta Guellstorff, Susanne Steiner, Jürgen Wasem.   

Abstract

Objective of this study was to determine 1-year survival, costs and cost-effectiveness of the artificial liver support system Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and an underlying alcoholic liver disease. In a case-control study, 13 patients treated with MARS were compared to 23 controls of similar age, sex and severity of disease. Inpatient hospital costs data were extracted from patients' files and hospital's internal costing. Patients and treating GPs were contacted, thus determining resource use and survival 1-year after treatment. Mean 1-year survival time in MARS group was 261 days and 148 days in controls. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows advantages of MARS patients (Logrank: P=0.057). Direct medical costs per patient for initial hospital stay and 1-year follow-up from a payer's perspective were Euro 18,792 for MARS patients and Euro 9638 for controls. The costs per life-year gained are Euro 29,719 (time horizon 1 year). From a societal perspective, the numbers are higher (costs per life-year gained: Euro 79,075), mainly because of the fact that there is no regular reimbursement of MARS and therefore intervention costs were not calculated from payer's perspective. A trade-off between medical benefit and higher costs has to be made, but 1-year results suggest an acceptable cost-effectiveness of MARS. Prolonging the time horizon and including indirect costs, which will be done in future research, would probably improve cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12950964     DOI: 10.1034/j.1478-3231.23.s.3.5.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  5 in total

1.  Cost-utility of molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in acute liver failure.

Authors:  Taru Kantola; Suvi Mäklin; Anna-Maria Koivusalo; Pirjo Räsänen; Anne Rissanen; Risto Roine; Harri Sintonen; Krister Höckerstedt; Helena Isoniemi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL).

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Sarin; Ashish Kumar; John A Almeida; Yogesh Kumar Chawla; Sheung Tat Fan; Hitendra Garg; H Janaka de Silva; Saeed Sadiq Hamid; Rajiv Jalan; Piyawat Komolmit; George K Lau; Qing Liu; Kaushal Madan; Rosmawati Mohamed; Qin Ning; Salimur Rahman; Archana Rastogi; Stephen M Riordan; Puja Sakhuja; Didier Samuel; Samir Shah; Barjesh Chander Sharma; Praveen Sharma; Yasuhiro Takikawa; Babu Ram Thapa; Chun-Tao Wai; Man-Fung Yuen
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 6.047

3.  Liver dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Rakhi Maiwall; Jaswinder Singh Maras; Suman Lata Nayak; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Economic evaluation of the artificial liver support system MARS in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Authors:  Franz P Hessel
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-10-05

5.  An evaluation of the usefulness of extracorporeal liver support techniques in patients with severe liver dysfunction.

Authors:  Mariusz Piechota; Anna Piechota; Małgorzata Misztal; Szymon Bernas; Iwona Pietraszek-Grzywaczewska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.318

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.