Literature DB >> 12950889

Criteria for prescribing optometric interventions: literature review and practitioner survey.

Claire I O'Leary1, Bruce J W Evans.   

Abstract

The core function of optometrists is the prescribing of refractive corrections, yet a literature review revealed a lack of evidence-based research on criteria for determining when a refractive correction is required. The reported criteria used by practising optometrists were investigated using a questionnaire to survey prescribing habits for borderline hypermetropia, presbyopia, astigmatism, and horizontal and vertical heterophoria. Thirty-eight questionnaires were returned and the results analysed. We calculated the 'cut off' point above which the anomaly would be corrected over 50% of the time that it was encountered. There was a large variation for each category, but it was clear that the presence or absence of symptoms was an important factor for most optometrists when deciding whether to correct a small error. It was found that for symptomatic patients, most optometrists would correct an anomaly if it reached: +1.00 D of hypermetropia, a reading addition of +0.75 D for presbyopia, -0.75 DC of astigmatism, 1.5 prism dioptres (Delta) of horizontal aligning prism, and 1 Delta of vertical dissociated heterophoria. For asymptomatic patients, optometrists would not correct any of the hypermetropic anomalies or heterophorias that were specified in our questionnaire. However most would correct a presbyopic error of +1.50 D or above, or an astigmatic error of -1.50 DC or above, even in the absence of symptoms. These results were compared with previously published guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12950889     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  7 in total

1.  Unexpectedly high prevalence of asthenopia in Australian school children identified by the CISS survey tool.

Authors:  Barbara M Junghans; Serap Azizoglu; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Psychometric Assessment of the Persian Version of the Revised Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey in Young Adults with Convergence Insufficiency.

Authors:  Payam Nabovati; Mohammad Kamali; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Ali Mirzajani; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-12

3.  Reply to: Mallett unit or fully fusionable images for prisms against asthenopia?

Authors:  Bruce John William Evans; Ketan Parmar; Christine Dickinson
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-10-17

4.  Characterizing Refractive Errors, Near Accommodative and Vergence Anomalies and Symptoms in an Optometry Clinic.

Authors:  Samuel O Wajuihian
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?

Authors:  Joanna M N Otto; Miriam Kromeier; Michael Bach; Guntram Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  A survey of the criteria for prescribing in cases of borderline refractive errors.

Authors:  Einat Shneor; Bruce John William Evans; Yael Fine; Yehudit Shapira; Liat Gantz; Ariela Gordon-Shaag
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  An investigation of low power convex lenses (adds) for eyestrain in the digital age (CLEDA).

Authors:  Robert Yammouni; Bruce Jw Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-04-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.