Literature DB >> 12949932

Early detection of prostate cancer with low PSA cut-off values leads to significant stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Andreas P Berger1, Robert Spranger, Kurt Kofler, Hannes Steiner, Georg Bartsch, Wolfgang Horninger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) contributed to a shift in tumor stage at diagnosis in patients with prostate cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of PSA screening with low PSA cut-off values on mean total and percent-free PSA levels in patients with prostate cancers at the time of diagnosis as well as on pathologic stage and mean Gleason scores in positive biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.
METHODS: Data of 875 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancers between 1996 and 2001 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into six groups according to the year of biopsy. Annual changes in total and percent-free PSA values, in Gleason scores of biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens, and in pathologic stages of radical prostatectomy specimens were assessed.
RESULTS: Mean PSA of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer decreased from 13.11 ng/ml (percent-free PSA: 11.89%) in 1996 to 7.33 ng/ml (percent-free PSA: 12.58%) in 2001 (P < 0.05). The percentage of organ-confined prostatectomy specimens increased from 64.3% in 1996 to 81.5% in 2001 (P < 0.05). However, mean Gleason scores increased from 5.23 to 6.33 over the 6 years (P < 0.05). The percentage of patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancers and PSA values below 4 ng/ml increased from 14.0% in 1996 to 39.2% in 2001. In the group with PSA values below 4 ng/ml organ-confined cancers were found in 80.0-95.2% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: PSAg screening with low cut-off levels has led to a significant reduction of mean baseline PSA levels in prostate cancer patients and to a significant increase in the percentage of organ-confined radical prostatectomy specimens, whereas mean Gleason scores have remained relatively constant. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12949932     DOI: 10.1002/pros.10278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  5 in total

1.  Specific spatial distribution patterns of tumor foci are associated with a low risk of biochemical recurrence in pT2pN0R0 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Okyaz Eminaga; Mahmoud Abbas; Olaf Bettendorf; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsy tissue.

Authors:  P A Humphrey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer with PSA <4 ng/ml at diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  M Bonet; A Merglen; G Fioretta; E Rapiti; I Neyroud-Caspar; R Zanetti; R Miralbell; C Bouchardy
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  miR-21 may acts as an oncomir by targeting RECK, a matrix metalloproteinase regulator, in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sabrina Thalita Reis; José Pontes-Junior; Alberto Azoubel Antunes; Marcos Francisco Dall'Oglio; Nelson Dip; Carlo Camargo Passerotti; Guilherme Ayres Rossini; Denis Reis Morais; Adriano Joao Nesrallah; Camila Piantino; Miguel Srougi; Katia R Leite
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Changes in pathologic outcomes and operative trends with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Aaron Bernie; Ranjith Ramasamy; Adnan Ali; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.