Literature DB >> 12949698

Changing concepts in the systematics of bacterial nitrogen-fixing legume symbionts.

Hiroyucki Sawada1, L David Kuykendall, John M Young.   

Abstract

As of February 2003, bacteria that form nitrogen-fixing symbiotic associations with legumes have been confirmed in 44 species of 12 genera. Phylogenies of these taxa containing legume symbionts based on the comparative analysis of 16S rDNA sequences show that they are not clustered in one lineage but are distributed in the classes Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, and dispersed over the following nine monophyletic groups, being intermingled with other taxa that do not contain legume symbionts (shown in parentheses below): Group 1, which comprises Rhizobium and Allorhizobium species containing legume symbionts (intermingled with Agrobacterium and Blastobacter species, which are nonsymbionts); Group 2, Sinorhizobium and Ensifer species (with unclassified nonsymbionts); Group 3, Mesorhizobium species (with nonsymbiotic Aminobacter and Pseudaminobacter species); Group 4, Bradyrhizobium species and Blastobacter denitrificans (with nonsymbiotic Agromonas, Nitrobacter, Afipia, and Rhodopseudomonas species); Group 5, 'Methylobacterium nodulans" (with nonsymbiotic Methylobacterium species); Group 6, Azorhizobium species (with nonsymbiotic Xanthobacter and Aquabacter species); Group 7, 'Devosia neptuniae" (with nonsymbiotic Devosia species and unclassified nonsymbionts); Group 8, symbiotic Burkholderia strains (with nonsymbiotic Burkholderia species); and Group 9, Ralstonia taiwanensis (with nonsymbiotic Ralstonia species). For Groups 5, 8, and 9, the present classification, in which 'each monophyletic group comprises one genus wherein legume symbionts and nonsymbionts are intermingled with each other, " is considered to be retained as is because they are clearly separated from other genera at high bootstrap values and have already been sufficiently characterized based on polyphasic taxonomy. As for the remaining six monophyletic groups, on the other hand, there are currently three options for emending their current classification (definitions and circumscriptions) at the generic level: A) the current classification shall be retained as is; B) all the genera within each monophyletic group shall be amalgamated into one single genus in conformity with the results of phylogenetic analysis; or C) each subordinate lineage in each monophyletic group shall be proposed as a genus. It is considered that research and discussions will be continuously conducted for emending the classification of these monophyletic groups based chiefly on Options B and C as preferable candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12949698     DOI: 10.2323/jgam.49.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-1260            Impact factor:   1.452


  42 in total

1.  Microarray-based detection and typing of the Rhizobium nodulation gene nodC: potential of DNA arrays to diagnose biological functions of interest.

Authors:  Cyril Bontemps; Geoffroy Golfier; Carine Gris-Liebe; Sébastien Carrere; Luc Talini; Catherine Boivin-Masson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The net of life: reconstructing the microbial phylogenetic network.

Authors:  Victor Kunin; Leon Goldovsky; Nikos Darzentas; Christos A Ouzounis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  In situ phylogenetic structure and diversity of wild Bradyrhizobium communities.

Authors:  J L Sachs; S W Kembel; A H Lau; E L Simms
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Burkholderia phymatum strains capable of nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris are present in Moroccan soils.

Authors:  C Talbi; M J Delgado; L Girard; A Ramírez-Trujillo; J Caballero-Mellado; E J Bedmar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evolutionary transitions in bacterial symbiosis.

Authors:  Joel L Sachs; Ryan G Skophammer; John U Regus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Microbial Ecology of Snow Reveals Taxa-Specific Biogeographical Structure.

Authors:  Shawn P Brown; Ari Jumpponen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Response of rhizobial populations to moderate copper stress applied to an agricultural soil.

Authors:  G Laguerre; L Courde; R Nouaïm; I Lamy; C Revellin; M C Breuil; R Chaussod
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 8.  Microbial genome-enabled insights into plant-microorganism interactions.

Authors:  David S Guttman; Alice C McHardy; Paul Schulze-Lefert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Prospecting metal-tolerant rhizobia for phytoremediation of mining soils from Morocco using Anthyllis vulneraria L.

Authors:  N El Aafi; N Saidi; A Filali Maltouf; P Perez-Palacios; M Dary; F Brhada; E Pajuelo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Efficiency of partner choice and sanctions in Lotus is not altered by nitrogen fertilization.

Authors:  John U Regus; Kelsey A Gano; Amanda C Hollowell; Joel L Sachs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.