PURPOSE: Varicocele is a common clinical condition that affects 15% of the male population and is an important cause of male infertility. Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous treatment with retrograde sclerosis is a good alternative to surgery. We report our experience in calculating the total radiation dose to patient and the associated risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study was performed on 67 patients undergoing percutaneous treatment of varicocele with transbrachial approach and retrograde sclerosis. Thirteen dosimeters with two TLD detectors were positioned on the patients' skin. Calculation of the Entrance Surface Dose and application of appropriate transmission coefficients of the depth-dose allowed us to determine the Equivalent Doses for the single organs. Similar studies were conducted during plain abdominal x-ray and urography for comparative purposes. RESULTS: The mean effective dose during percutaneous treatment of varicocele was 18 mSv, whereas the dose for abdominal x-ray was 1.31 mSv and that for urography was 4.6 mSv. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Examinations involving the use of x-rays have been estimated to contribute to half of all the radiation absorbed by the population, and the number of both diagnostic examinations and interventional procedures is steadily rising. Radiation exposure, especially in children, requires special consideration. Percutaneous treatment of varicocele is a valuable alternative to surgery, not least because of reduced exposure. The use of specially-built lead coats and the creation of regional referral centres employing specialised staff are two possible measures that could further reduce radiation doses and dispel concerns about this procedure.
PURPOSE: Varicocele is a common clinical condition that affects 15% of the male population and is an important cause of male infertility. Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous treatment with retrograde sclerosis is a good alternative to surgery. We report our experience in calculating the total radiation dose to patient and the associated risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study was performed on 67 patients undergoing percutaneous treatment of varicocele with transbrachial approach and retrograde sclerosis. Thirteen dosimeters with two TLD detectors were positioned on the patients' skin. Calculation of the Entrance Surface Dose and application of appropriate transmission coefficients of the depth-dose allowed us to determine the Equivalent Doses for the single organs. Similar studies were conducted during plain abdominal x-ray and urography for comparative purposes. RESULTS: The mean effective dose during percutaneous treatment of varicocele was 18 mSv, whereas the dose for abdominal x-ray was 1.31 mSv and that for urography was 4.6 mSv. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Examinations involving the use of x-rays have been estimated to contribute to half of all the radiation absorbed by the population, and the number of both diagnostic examinations and interventional procedures is steadily rising. Radiation exposure, especially in children, requires special consideration. Percutaneous treatment of varicocele is a valuable alternative to surgery, not least because of reduced exposure. The use of specially-built lead coats and the creation of regional referral centres employing specialised staff are two possible measures that could further reduce radiation doses and dispel concerns about this procedure.