Literature DB >> 12949152

Transposable elements reveal the impact of introgression, rather than transposition, in Pisum diversity, evolution, and domestication.

Alexander V Vershinin1, Theodore R Allnutt, Maggie R Knox, Mike J Ambrose, T H Noel Ellis.   

Abstract

The genetic structure and evolutionary history of the genus Pisum were studied exploiting our germplasm collection to compare the contribution of different mechanisms to the generation of diversity. We used sequence-specific amplification polymorphism (SSAP) markers to assess insertion site polymorphism generated by a representative of each of the two major groups of LTR-containing retrotransposons, PDR1 (Ty1/copia-like) and Cyclops (Ty3/gypsy-like), together with Pis1, a member of the En/Spm transposon superfamily. The analysis of extended sets of the four main Pisum species, P. fulvum, P. elatius, P. abyssinicum, and P. sativum, together with the reference set, revealed a distinct pattern of the NJ (Neighbor-Joining) tree for each basic lineage, which reflects the different evolutionary history of each species. The SSAP markers showed that Pisum is exceptionally polymorphic for an inbreeding species. The patterns of phylogenetic relationships deduced from different transposable elements were in general agreement. The retrotransposon-derived markers gave a clearer separation of the main lineages than the Pis1 markers and were able to distinguish the truly wild form of P. elatius from the antecedents of P. sativum. There were more species-specific and unique PDR1 markers than Pis1 markers in P. fulvum and P. elatius, pointing to PDR1 activity during speciation and diversification, but the proportion of these markers is low. The overall genetic diversity of Pisum and the extreme polymorphism in all species, except P. abyssinicum, indicate a high contribution of recombination between multiple ancestral lineages compared to transposition within lineages. The two independently domesticated pea species, P. abyssinicum and P. sativum, arose in contrasting ways from the common processes of hybridization, introgression, and selection without associated transpositional activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12949152     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  29 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of plant diversity with retrotransposon-based molecular markers.

Authors:  R Kalendar; A J Flavell; T H N Ellis; T Sjakste; C Moisy; A H Schulman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Divergent non-LTR retrotransposon lineages from the genomes of scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones).

Authors:  Sergei Glushkov; Olga Novikova; Alexander Blinov; Victor Fet
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Insertional polymorphism and antiquity of PDR1 retrotransposon insertions in pisum species.

Authors:  Runchun Jing; Maggie R Knox; Jennifer M Lee; Alexander V Vershinin; Michael Ambrose; T H Noel Ellis; Andrew J Flavell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic diversity analysis in Vicia species using retrotransposon-based SSAP markers.

Authors:  Alberto Martín Sanz; Susana Gilsanz Gonzalez; Naeem Hasan Syed; Maria Jose Suso; Constantino Caminero Saldaña; Andrew J Flavell
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Gene-based sequence diversity analysis of field pea (Pisum).

Authors:  Runchun Jing; Richard Johnson; Andrea Seres; Gyorgy Kiss; Mike J Ambrose; Maggie R Knox; T H Noel Ellis; Andrew J Flavell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A conserved molecular basis for photoperiod adaptation in two temperate legumes.

Authors:  James L Weller; Lim Chee Liew; Valérie F G Hecht; Vinodan Rajandran; Rebecca E Laurie; Stephen Ridge; Bénédicte Wenden; Jacqueline K Vander Schoor; Odile Jaminon; Christelle Blassiau; Marion Dalmais; Catherine Rameau; Abdelhafid Bendahmane; Richard C Macknight; Isabelle Lejeune-Hénaut
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species.

Authors:  Hong-Kyu Choi; Jeong-Hwan Mun; Dong-Jin Kim; Hongyan Zhu; Jong-Min Baek; Joanne Mudge; Bruce Roe; Noel Ellis; Jeff Doyle; Gyorgy B Kiss; Nevin D Young; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The genetic diversity and evolution of field pea (Pisum) studied by high throughput retrotransposon based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) marker analysis.

Authors:  Runchun Jing; Alexander Vershinin; Jacek Grzebyta; Paul Shaw; Petr Smýkal; David Marshall; Michael J Ambrose; T H Noel Ellis; Andrew J Flavell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: is there a common genetic basis to the 'domestication syndrome' for legumes?

Authors:  Norman F Weeden
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  High-throughput retrotransposon-based fluorescent markers: improved information content and allele discrimination.

Authors:  Maggie Knox; Carol Moreau; James Lipscombe; David Baker; Noel Ellis
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.