BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the efficacy of clinical interventions for reducing treatment non-adherence have generated contrasting findings, and treatment non-adherence remains common in clinical practice. AIMS: To systematically review whether there are effective clinical interventions that community psychiatric services can implement to reduce non-adherence. METHOD: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were used to assess the efficacy of interventions to enhance adherence. RESULTS: We reviewed 24 studies, more than half of which were RCTs. In 14 studies the experimental intervention was an educational programme. Five studies evaluated pre-discharge educational sessions, three studies explored the benefit of psychotherapeutic interventions and two studies looked at the effect of telephone prompts. The overall estimate of the efficacy of these interventions produced an odds ratio of 2.59 (95% CI 2.21-3.03) for dichotomous outcomes, and a standardised mean difference of 0.36 (95% CI 0.06-0.66) for continuous outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Community psychiatric services can potentially use effective clinical interventions, backed by scientific evidence, for reducing patient non-adherence.
BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the efficacy of clinical interventions for reducing treatment non-adherence have generated contrasting findings, and treatment non-adherence remains common in clinical practice. AIMS: To systematically review whether there are effective clinical interventions that community psychiatric services can implement to reduce non-adherence. METHOD: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were used to assess the efficacy of interventions to enhance adherence. RESULTS: We reviewed 24 studies, more than half of which were RCTs. In 14 studies the experimental intervention was an educational programme. Five studies evaluated pre-discharge educational sessions, three studies explored the benefit of psychotherapeutic interventions and two studies looked at the effect of telephone prompts. The overall estimate of the efficacy of these interventions produced an odds ratio of 2.59 (95% CI 2.21-3.03) for dichotomous outcomes, and a standardised mean difference of 0.36 (95% CI 0.06-0.66) for continuous outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Community psychiatric services can potentially use effective clinical interventions, backed by scientific evidence, for reducing patient non-adherence.
Authors: Marjolein J C Willemen; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Yvonne Buggy; Deborah Layton; Sabine M J M Straus; Hubert G M Leufkens; Toine C G Egberts Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Fernando Cañas; Koksal Alptekin; Jean Michel Azorin; Vincent Dubois; Robin Emsley; Antonio G García; Philip Gorwood; Peter M Haddad; Dieter Naber; José M Olivares; Georgios Papageorgiou; Miquel Roca Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Stefan Priebe; Alexandra Burton; Deborah Ashby; Richard Ashcroft; Tom Burns; Anthony David; Sandra Eldridge; Mike Firn; Martin Knapp; Rose McCabe Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2009-09-28 Impact factor: 3.630