Literature DB >> 12948873

Benefit-risk assessment of Rosuvastatin 10 to 40 milligrams.

H Bryan Brewer1.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the benefit-risk profile of rosuvastatin at doses of 10 to 40 mg. In dyslipidemic patients, rosuvastatin produced markedly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and equivalent or greater improvements in various lipid measures, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. In addition, rosuvastatin is more effective than these statins in allowing patients to reach National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III and Joint European Societies LDL cholesterol goals. The safety profile of rosuvastatin was reviewed (as of April 2003) in 12,569 patients, representing 14,231 patient-years of treatment at doses up to 80 mg. In controlled trials, rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg demonstrated a similar adverse event profile to those for atorvastatin 10 to 80 mg, simvastatin 10 to 80 mg, and pravastatin 10 to 40 mg. Myopathy (defined as muscle symptoms plus serum creatine kinase levels >10 times the upper limit of normal) attributed to rosuvastatin occurred in < or = 0.03% of patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg. No cases of rhabdomyolysis occurred in patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg. Clinically significant alanine aminotransferase elevations occurred in 0.2% of patients receiving rosuvastatin and those receiving atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. Compared with other widely used statins, the benefit-risk profile of rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg appears to be very favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948873     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00779-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  34 in total

1.  Squalene synthase inhibitor lapaquistat acetate: could anything be better than statins?

Authors:  James K Liao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Are lower levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol beneficial? a review of recent data.

Authors:  Anders G Olsson
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Other than potency, are all statins the same?

Authors:  Nicola Abate; Manisha Chandalia
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Mechanisms, significance and treatment of vascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on lipid-regulating therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Woodman; Gerard T Chew; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Evidence-based management of statin myopathy.

Authors:  Charles R Harper; Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Overcoming 'ageism' bias in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia : a review of safety issues with statins in the elderly.

Authors:  Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in achieving lipid goals in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease in clinical practice: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study (DISCOVERY Alpha study).

Authors:  Azan S Binbrek; Avishay Elis; Muayed Al-Zaibag; Jaan Eha; Irena Keber; Ada M Cuevas; Swati Mukherjee; Thomas R Miller
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2006-01

Review 8.  Rosuvastatin in elderly patients.

Authors:  Michael H Davidson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Niacin or ezetimibe for patients with, or at risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Robert Guthrie
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-31

Review 10.  Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: at the heart of the action of lipid-modulating therapy with statins, fibrates, niacin, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors.

Authors:  M John Chapman; Wilfried Le Goff; Maryse Guerin; Anatol Kontush
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.