Literature DB >> 12948800

Electrical-induced pain diminishes somatosensory evoked magnetic cortical fields.

T D Tran1, M Hoshiyama, K Inui, R Kakigi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of conditioning painful stimulation on the early somatosensory magnetic fields (SEF) of test stimulation, in order to clarify the location of the gating effect of pain on tactile response.
METHODS: We used a conditioning stimulus (CS) and test stimulus (TS) paradigm. The CS was applied at the left index finger followed by the TS at the left median nerve. The interstimulus interval between the CS and TS was varied from 100 to 1000 ms. There were two sessions corresponding to two intensities of the CS, painful CS (PCS) and non-painful CS (NPCS). Early components of SEF recorded 20 (1M) and 30 ms (2M) following the TS and the components obtained 20 (1m) and 30 ms (2m) following the CS were analyzed. Each value was compared between the two sessions.
RESULTS: PCS and NPCS attenuated the response of the 2M but not the 1M. The effect of PCS was significantly stronger and lasted longer than that of NPCS. The 1m and 2m components did not differ between PCS and NPCS in terms of amplitude and latency.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicated that the early components of the median nerve SEF were affected by a preceding painful stimulation much more than a non-painful stimulus given on the median nerve, and that the sensory gating effect of a painful stimulation on tactile sensation lasted longer than that of a non-painful stimulation. Furthermore, our findings suggested the existence of a 'touch gate' (effect of pain on tactile sensation) at the level of the thalamus or primary somatosensory cortex (SI). SIGNIFICANCE: The finding suggested that the touch gate might lie in the thalamus or SI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948800     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00151-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  6 in total

1.  Nociceptive afferent activity alters the SI RA neuron response to mechanical skin stimulation.

Authors:  B L Whitsel; O V Favorov; Y Li; J Lee; P M Quibrera; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Common neural systems for contact heat and laser pain stimulation reveal higher-level pain processing.

Authors:  Christoph Helmchen; Christian Mohr; Meike Roehl; U Bingel; Juergen Lorenz; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Local subcutaneous and muscle pain impairs detection of passive movements at the human thumb.

Authors:  N S Weerakkody; J S Blouin; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Respiratory-related evoked potential measures of respiratory sensory gating.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Sarah Chan; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-08-21

5.  An inhibitory interaction of human cortical responses to stimuli preferentially exciting Adelta or C fibers.

Authors:  T D Tran; D Matre; K L Casey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Differential effects of painful and non-painful stimulation on tactile processing in fibromyalgia syndrome and subjects with masochistic behaviour.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Vanessa Krause; Valery Legrain; Markus Ploner; Rainer Freynhagen; Ilka Melchior; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.