Literature DB >> 12948732

Comparison of BOLD fMRI and MEG characteristics to vibrotactile stimulation.

Pasi I Tuunanen1, Martin Kavec, Veikko Jousmäki, Jussi-Pekka Usenius, Riitta Hari, Riitta Salmelin, Risto A Kauppinen.   

Abstract

The characteristics of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to vibrotactile stimuli in humans were studied and compared. The stimuli, presented with interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 1 to 5 s, yielded highly reproducible MEG responses, with current dipoles in the primary somatosensory (SI) cortex in all subjects. BOLD fMRI responses to similar stimuli showed substantial intrasubject variation in the activation sites around the SI cortex. BOLD responses were detected in all subjects in the secondary somatosensory (SII) cortices as well, with comparable BOLD response amplitudes to those in the SI cortex. Current dipoles, used to model the MEG signals, were stronger at longer ISIs than shorter ISIs. The BOLD response amplitudes did not show a similar dependence on ISI, but the activated brain area was larger when longer ISIs or longer stimuli were applied. Our results support the view that combined use of brain mapping methods provides complementary information and should be considered in functional brain examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948732     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00256-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Complex relationship between BOLD signal and synchronization/desynchronization of human brain MEG oscillations.

Authors:  Georg Winterer; Frederick W Carver; Francesco Musso; Venkata Mattay; Daniel R Weinberger; Richard Coppola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A novel method for integrating MEG and BOLD fMRI signals with the linear convolution model in human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Cathy Nangini; Fred Tam; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human spinal cord during vibration stimulation of different dermatomes.

Authors:  Jane M Lawrence; Patrick W Stroman; Spyros S Kollias
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Concordance of MEG and fMRI patterns in adolescents during verb generation.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Scott K Holland; Jennifer Vannest
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Accuracy analysis of fMRI and MEG activations determined by intraoperative mapping.

Authors:  David G Ellis; Matthew L White; Satoru Hayasaka; David E Warren; Tony W Wilson; Michele R Aizenberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Difference in somatosensory evoked fields elicited by mechanical and electrical stimulations: Elucidation of the human homunculus by a noninvasive method.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; Takushi Shirai; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Akira Hashizume; Toshihide Harada; Yasuyo Mimori; Masayasu Matsumoto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Cortical brain responses during passive nonpainful median nerve stimulation at low frequencies (0.5-4 Hz): an fMRI study.

Authors:  Antonio Ferretti; Claudio Babiloni; Donatello Arienzo; Cosimo Del Gratta; Paolo Maria Rossini; Armando Tartaro; Gian Luca Romani
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Granger causal time-dependent source connectivity in the somatosensory network.

Authors:  Lin Gao; Linda Sommerlade; Brian Coffman; Tongsheng Zhang; Julia M Stephen; Dichen Li; Jue Wang; Celso Grebogi; Bjoern Schelter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Functional MRI of working memory and selective attention in vibrotactile frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Peter Sörös; Jonathan Marmurek; Fred Tam; Nicole Baker; W Richard Staines; Simon J Graham
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.288

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.