Literature DB >> 12948716

Neural correlates of incongruous visual information. An event-related fMRI study.

Pascale Michelon1, Abraham Z Snyder, Randy L Buckner, Mark McAvoy, Jeffrey M Zacks.   

Abstract

Incongruous information is better remembered than ordinary information. This result has been attributed both to semantic incongruity and surprise. To determine the contribution of each factor, we performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in which participants viewed pictures depicting ordinary and incongruous objects (e.g., head of a wrench fused onto a sheep body). To maximize surprise we administered novel incongruent pictures infrequently in an initial scan. (This scan also included infrequent color-inverted pictures as a control for frequency.) To obtain a pure measure of the effect of incongruity we conducted a second scan in which participants viewed equal numbers of ordinary and incongruous pictures. Signal increases were greater for incongruous versus ordinary and oddball stimuli throughout the ventral and dorsal visual pathways, and in prefrontal cortex bilaterally. Signal decreases were larger for incongruous than for ordinary stimuli bilaterally in lateral parietal regions. A subset of regions near the right frontal operculum and extending laterally responded only to, or more strongly to, infrequent incongruous pictures. A second, purely behavioral, experiment involving a separate group of participants demonstrated that incongruous pictures were better recognized than ordinary pictures. We interpret our results as suggesting that, although correlates of a surprise response can be observed, better memory for incongruous visual information is attributable mainly to more processing and, consequently, better encoding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948716     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00111-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  34 in total

1.  Evidence accumulation and the moment of recognition: dissociating perceptual recognition processes using fMRI.

Authors:  Elisabeth J Ploran; Steven M Nelson; Katerina Velanova; David I Donaldson; Steven E Petersen; Mark E Wheeler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Maturational changes in anterior cingulate and frontoparietal recruitment support the development of error processing and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Katerina Velanova; Mark E Wheeler; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Neural integration of iconic and unrelated coverbal gestures: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Antonia Green; Benjamin Straube; Susanne Weis; Andreas Jansen; Klaus Willmes; Kerstin Konrad; Tilo Kircher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Steven M Nelson; Kathleen M Arnold; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  High quality but limited quantity perceptual evidence produces neural accumulation in frontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Elisabeth J Ploran; Joshua J Tremel; Steven M Nelson; Mark E Wheeler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The strength of gradually accruing probabilistic evidence modulates brain activity during a categorical decision.

Authors:  Mark E Wheeler; Sarah G Woo; Tobin Ansel; Joshua J Tremel; Amanda L Collier; Katerina Velanova; Elisabeth J Ploran; Tianming Yang
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of error-related activity in the human brain.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Francis M Miezin; Steven M Nelson; Joseph W Dubis; Nico U F Dosenbach; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A parcellation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex.

Authors:  Steven M Nelson; Alexander L Cohen; Jonathan D Power; Gagan S Wig; Francis M Miezin; Mark E Wheeler; Katerina Velanova; David I Donaldson; Jeffrey S Phillips; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  A differentiation account of recognition memory: evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Mark E Wheeler; James L McClelland
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Role of the anterior insula in task-level control and focal attention.

Authors:  Steven M Nelson; Nico U F Dosenbach; Alexander L Cohen; Mark E Wheeler; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.