Literature DB >> 12948705

Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing.

Marieke Longcamp1, Jean-Luc Anton, Muriel Roth, Jean-Luc Velay.   

Abstract

In the present fMRI study, we addressed the question as to whether motor-perceptual interactions might be involved in reading. Recognizing the letters encountered when reading is generally assumed to be a purely visual process, yet because we know how to write, we also possess a sensorimotor representation of the letters. Does simply viewing a letter suffice to activate the corresponding motor representation? To answer this question, we asked right-handed subjects first to look at and then to copy single letters or pseudoletters. We established that the visual presentation of letters activated a part of the left premotor cortex (BA6) that was also activated when the letters were being written by the subjects. This premotor zone resembles Exner's area, which is thought to contain the motor programs necessary for producing letters. Visually presented pseudoletters, which had never been written before by the subjects, did not activate this region. These results indicate that the writing motor processes are implicitly evoked when passively observing letters. The cerebral representation of letters is therefore presumably not strictly visual, but based on a multicomponent neural network built up while learning concomitantly to read and write. One of the components might be a sensorimotor one associated with handwriting. This finding shows the existence of close functional relations between the reading and writing processes, and suggests that our reading abilities might be somehow dependent on the way we write.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948705     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00088-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  72 in total

1.  Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream.

Authors:  Iain DeWitt; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Fan Cao; Marianne Vu; Derek Ho Lung Chan; Jason M Lawrence; Lindsay N Harris; Qun Guan; Yi Xu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  What differs in visual recognition of handwritten vs. printed letters? An fMRI study.

Authors:  Marieke Longcamp; Yevhen Hlushchuk; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Contribution of writing to reading: Dissociation between cognitive and motor process in the left dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Chotiga Pattamadilok; Aurélie Ponz; Samuel Planton; Mireille Bonnard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Reading depends on writing, in Chinese.

Authors:  Li Hai Tan; John A Spinks; Guinevere F Eden; Charles A Perfetti; Wai Ting Siok
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Modality-specific cognitive function of medial and lateral human Brodmann area 6.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Manabu Honda; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  An event-related fMRI study of self-paced alphabetically ordered writing of single letters.

Authors:  I Rektor; I Rektorová; M Mikl; M Brázdil; P Krupa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception.

Authors:  Alan C N Wong; Isabel Gauthier; Brion Woroch; Casey DeBuse; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Comparison of the neural basis for imagined writing and drawing.

Authors:  Greg S Harrington; Dana Farias; Christine H Davis; Michael H Buonocore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  The similarity structure of distributed neural responses reveals the multiple representations of letters.

Authors:  David Rothlein; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.