Literature DB >> 12947385

P53 and radiation responses.

Peiwen Fei1, Wafik S El-Deiry.   

Abstract

Cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms (checkpoints) to monitor genomic integrity in order to ensure the high-fidelity transmission of genetic information. Cells harboring defects in checkpoint pathways respond to DNA damage improperly, which in turn may enhance the rate of cancer development. Ionizing radiation (IR) primarily leads to double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), which activate DNA damage checkpoints to initiate signals ultimately leading to a binary decision between cell death and cell survival. TP53 has been recognized as an important checkpoint protein, functioning mainly through transcriptional control of target genes that influence multiple response pathways and leading to the diversity of responses to IR in mammalian cells. We review how the tumor suppressor P53 is involved in the complex response to IR to enforce the cell's fate to live by inducing the growth arrest coupled to DNA damage repair or to die by inducing irreversible growth arrest or apoptosis. Moreover, recent insights have emerged in our understanding of how P53 modulates radiosensitivity in tissues following IR as well as its role in sensitizing cells to chemo- and radiotherapy. The P53 pathway remains an attractive target for exploitation in the war on cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12947385     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  126 in total

1.  Gene expression profiling in MOLT-4 cells during gamma-radiation-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Theres Lindgren; Torgny Stigbrand; Katrine Riklund; Lennart Johansson; David Eriksson
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  Computational modeling of signaling pathways mediating cell cycle checkpoint control and apoptotic responses to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; In Chio Lou; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Coordination between cell cycle progression and cell fate decision by the p53 and E2F1 pathways in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Zhang; Feng Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Malignant transformation and new primary tumours after therapeutic radiation for benign disease: substantial risks in certain tumour prone syndromes.

Authors:  D G R Evans; J M Birch; R T Ramsden; S Sharif; M E Baser
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Discriminatory suppression of homologous recombination by p53.

Authors:  Sheng Yun; Chadwick Lie-A-Cheong; Andrew C G Porter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Molecular design of new inhibitors of peroxidase activity of cytochrome c/cardiolipin complexes: fluorescent oxadiazole-derivatized cardiolipin.

Authors:  G G Borisenko; A A Kapralov; V A Tyurin; A Maeda; D A Stoyanovsky; V E Kagan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Hepatitis B virus X protein increases the Cdt1-to-geminin ratio inducing DNA re-replication and polyploidy.

Authors:  Lova Rakotomalala; Leo Studach; Wen-Horng Wang; Gerald Gregori; Ronald L Hullinger; Ourania Andrisani
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  DNA damage response, redox status and hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Cary N Weiss; Keisuke Ito
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Etoposide radiosensitizes p53-defective cholangiocarcinoma cell lines independent of their G2 checkpoint efficacies.

Authors:  Arunee Hematulin; Sutiwan Meethang; Kitsana Utapom; Sopit Wongkham; Daniel Sagan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Simultaneous analysis of p53 protein expression and cell proliferation in irradiated human lymphocytes by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Rafael de Freitas E Silva; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Dos Santos; Valéria Rěgo Alves Pereira; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.