Literature DB >> 12947361

Impact of the troponin standard on the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction.

Michael C Kontos1, Lucie M Fritz, F Philip Anderson, James L Tatum, Joseph P Ornato, Robert L Jesse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent recommendations are that troponin should replace creatine kinase (CK)-MB as the diagnostic standard for myocardial infarction (MI). The impact of this change has not been well described. Our objective was to determine the impact of a troponin standard on the prevalence of acute non-ST-elevation MI.
METHODS: The current study was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients without ST-segment elevation admitted for exclusion of myocardial ischemia to an inner city urban tertiary care center. All patients underwent serial marker sampling (CK, CK-MB, and cardiac troponin I [cTnI]). Patients with ST elevation consistent with acute MI (n = 130) or who did not have an 8 hour cTnI (n = 124) were excluded. The impact of 3 different cTnI diagnostic values were examined in 2181 patients: the lower limit of detectability (LLD); an optimal diagnostic value (OPT), chosen using receiver operator characteristic curve analysis; and the manufacturer's suggested upper reference level (URL), when compared to a gold standard CK-MB MI definition. In addition, MI prevalence was assessed using different CK-MB MI definitions and evaluated in patients with ischemic changes only.
RESULTS: The prevalence CK-MB MI was 7.8%. Using the various cTnI diagnostic values, the incidence of MI increased the prevalence by 28% to 195%. Using the optimal diagnostic value for cTnI, patients with cTnI elevations not meeting CK-MB MI criteria had an intermediate 30-day mortality (5.4%) compared to those with CK-MB MI (7.1%). Grouping the cTnI positive, CK-MB MI negative patients with the CK-MB MI patients rather than the non-CK-MB MI patients reduced mortality for both the MI (to 5.9%) and non-MI groups (from 1.9% to 1.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Changing to a troponin standard will have a substantial impact on the number of patients diagnosed with MI. The revised definition for MI will have important clinical and health care implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12947361     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00245-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  16 in total

1.  Emergency department assessment of patients with acute chest pain: myocardial perfusion imaging, blood tests, or both?

Authors:  Kevin C Allman; S Ben Freedman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Using biomarkers to assess risk and consider treatment strategies in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Ankie Amos; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Prognostic implications of increased cardiac biomarkers and ST segment depression in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: lessons from the acute coronary syndrome Israeli survey (ACSIS) 2002.

Authors:  I Ben-Dor; D Hasdai; S Behar; D Zahger; J Leor; H Hammerman; A Sandach; H Hod; S Gottlieb
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Recent trends in hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Oliver J Wang; Yongfei Wang; Jersey Chen; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  A methodological comparison of two European primary care databases and replication in a US claims database: inhaled long-acting beta-2-agonists and the risk of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A Afonso; S Schmiedl; C Becker; S Tcherny-Lessenot; P Primatesta; E Plana; P Souverein; Y Wang; J C Korevaar; J Hasford; R Reynolds; M C H de Groot; R Schlienger; O Klungel; M Rottenkolber
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Implications of the new definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C-K Wong; H D White
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Trends in incidence, severity, and outcome of hospitalized myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Susan A Weston; Yariv Gerber; Jill M Killian; Shannon M Dunlay; Allan S Jaffe; Malcolm R Bell; Jan Kors; Barbara P Yawn; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Troponins and high-sensitivity troponins as markers of necrosis in CAD and heart failure.

Authors:  Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Long-term trends in myocardial infarction incidence and case fatality in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart study.

Authors:  Nisha I Parikh; Philimon Gona; Martin G Larson; Caroline S Fox; Emelia J Benjamin; Joanne M Murabito; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The new definition of myocardial infarction--can we use it?

Authors:  Stefan Agewall; Christian Löwbeer
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.