Literature DB >> 12946752

Quantifying the change in endorectal magnetic resonance imaging-defined tumor volume during neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy in patients with prostate cancer.

Mona V Sanghani1, Delray Schultz, Clare M Tempany, David Titelbaum, Andrew A Renshaw, Marian Loffredo, Kerri Cote, Beth McMahon, Anthony V D'Amico.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the changes seen in the endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI)-defined prostate volume, predominant tumor volume, and secondary tumor volume during neoadjuvant total androgen suppression (TAS).
METHODS: Between July 1997 and April 2001, 152 consecutive patients with clinical Stage T1b-T3cNXM0 prostate cancer were treated with 6 months of TAS and external beam radiotherapy. erMRI was conducted before and after 2 months of neoadjuvant TAS. The median values and percentage of changes in the erMRI-measured prostate volume and primary and secondary tumor volumes during neoadjuvant TAS were calculated and compared, using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank method, for the patients overall and stratified by pretreatment risk group.
RESULTS: All patients had a significant decline in their erMRI-defined median prostate volume (36.6 versus 25.7 cm(3), P <0.0001) during 2 months of neoadjuvant TAS. The median primary tumor volume decreased significantly in the intermediate-risk (0.77 versus 0.52 cm(3), P <0.0001) and high-risk (2.48 versus 0.83 cm(3), P <0.0001) patients. The median secondary tumor volume approached a significant decline in only the high-risk patients (0.45 versus 0.31 cm(3), P = 0.15). Fourteen percent of patients had an increase in their primary tumor volume during neoadjuvant TAS.
CONCLUSIONS: The erMRI-defined primary and secondary tumor volumes generally decreased in the study population during neoadjuvant TAS. However, 14% of patients had an increase in their primary tumor volume during androgen suppression therapy. The clinical significance of this awaits further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946752     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00463-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of tamsulosin in the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms in advanced prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Tong Zhang; Haihu Wu; Shuai Liu; Wei He; Kejia Ding
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Analysis of prognostic factors in localized high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy, hypofractionated 3D-CRT and neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (trimodality therapy).

Authors:  Manabu Aoki; Kenta Miki; Masahito Kido; Hiroshi Sasaki; Wataru Nakamura; Yoshikazu Kijima; Masao Kobayashi; Shin Egawa; Chihiro Kanehira
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Predictors of prostate volume reduction following neoadjuvant cytoreductive androgen suppression.

Authors:  Krishan R Jethwa; Keith M Furutani; Lance A Mynderse; Torrence M Wilson; Richard Choo; Bernard F King; Eric Bergstralh; Brian J Davis
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-11-04

4.  A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kenta Miki; Hiroshi Sasaki; Masahito Kido; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Manabu Aoki; Shin Egawa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  The Influence of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Prostate Size and Voiding Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients in Korea.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Hong Chung; Jae Young Park; Jeong Gu Lee; Jae Hyun Bae
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.835

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.