Literature DB >> 12946336

An exploratory metasynthesis of midwifery practice in the United States.

Holly P Kennedy1, Amy L Rousseau, Lisa Kane Low.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a metasynthesis of six qualitative studies of midwifery care and process; identify common themes and metaphors among the six studies for further exploration and theory development; and create a framework for further metasynthesis of qualitative studies of midwifery practice in the USA.
DESIGN: A qualitative metasynthesis to analyse, synthesise, and interpret six qualitative studies on the process and practice of midwifery care. SAMPLE AND
SETTING: Hospital, birth centre, and home birth settings were represented across all of the studies. Participants included nurse- and direct-entry midwives who provided both childbearing and gynaecological care. Recipients of midwifery care also received both childbearing and gynaecological care.
FINDINGS: Four overarching themes were identified: the midwife as an 'instrument' of care; the woman as a 'partner' in care; an 'alliance' between the woman and midwife; and the 'environment' of care. These were interpretively and conceptually arrayed into a helix model of midwifery care. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this exploratory metasynthesis clearly indicate that the practice of midwifery is a dynamic partnership between the midwife and the woman, and reflects an environmental perspective. In a country that has a standard of highly technical childbirth care, perhaps the most outstanding concept of this model is that of the midwife as an 'instrument' of care. The significance of the findings will be determined by their ability to guide further research efforts to support a standard of midwifery care for all women in the USA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This model offers a benchmark and a structure for considering the dynamic elements of midwifery practice and key roles that the midwife plays in the health care of women and babies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946336     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(03)00034-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  8 in total

1.  Midwifery care: reflections of midwifery clients.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Doherty
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

2.  "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.

Authors:  Andrew Booth
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

3.  A patient perspective in research on intercultural caring in maternity care: A meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Anita Wikberg; Terese Bondas
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2010-02-08

4.  The experiences of midwives in integrated maternity care: A qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  A Kristienne McFarland; Jacqueline Jones; Jackie Luchsinger; Katherine Kissler; Denise C Smith
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.372

5.  A critical interpretive synthesis of the roles of midwives in health systems.

Authors:  Cristina A Mattison; John N Lavis; Michael G Wilson; Eileen K Hutton; Michelle L Dion
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-07-08

6.  Advancing quality and safety of perinatal services in India: opportunities for effective midwifery integration.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Reena Titoria; Paulomi Niles; Kathrin Stoll; Vishwajeet Kumar; Dinesh Baswal; Kaveri Mayra; Inderjeet Kaur; Pandora Hardtman
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.547

7.  Iranian midwives' lived experiences of providing continuous midwife-led intrapartum care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Leila Amiri-Farahani; Maryam Gharacheh; Narges Sadeghzadeh; Hamid Peyravi; Sally Pezaro
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  The storying of birth.

Authors:  Jennifer MacLellan
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2020-06-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.