OBJECTIVE: In this review, we will focus on recent molecular typing methods that can be applied to different pathogens and assess their values and limitations. BACKGROUND: Resistant subgroups within a species of pathogenic organisms often emerge as dominant strains under the selective pressures of antibiotics, vaccinations, and new health care practices. The emergence of resistant organisms has added to the burden and cost of health care-related infections. Pathogens derived from a common ancestry are often difficult to distinguish by conventional methods, and the practice of clinical microbiology and infectious disease epidemiology must adapt to this problem. DISCUSSION: Conventional strain typing methods provide a limited means of distinguishing epidemic from endemic or sporadic isolates of pathogens. Nucleic acid-based methods complement conventional and serologic methods of organism isolation and typing. Often, these genomic methods offer more discrimination and details than the phenotype-based conventional methods. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Highly sensitive molecular techniques are capable of detecting single base pair substitutions and resolving the mechanism of underlying complex variation.
OBJECTIVE: In this review, we will focus on recent molecular typing methods that can be applied to different pathogens and assess their values and limitations. BACKGROUND: Resistant subgroups within a species of pathogenic organisms often emerge as dominant strains under the selective pressures of antibiotics, vaccinations, and new health care practices. The emergence of resistant organisms has added to the burden and cost of health care-related infections. Pathogens derived from a common ancestry are often difficult to distinguish by conventional methods, and the practice of clinical microbiology and infectious disease epidemiology must adapt to this problem. DISCUSSION: Conventional strain typing methods provide a limited means of distinguishing epidemic from endemic or sporadic isolates of pathogens. Nucleic acid-based methods complement conventional and serologic methods of organism isolation and typing. Often, these genomic methods offer more discrimination and details than the phenotype-based conventional methods. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Highly sensitive molecular techniques are capable of detecting single base pair substitutions and resolving the mechanism of underlying complex variation.
Authors: Mimi Healy; Joe Huong; Traci Bittner; Maricel Lising; Stacie Frye; Sabeen Raza; Robert Schrock; Janet Manry; Alex Renwick; Robert Nieto; Charles Woods; James Versalovic; James R Lupski Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Patrice Francois; Antoine Huyghe; Yvan Charbonnier; Manuela Bento; Sébastien Herzig; Ivan Topolski; Bénédicte Fleury; Daniel Lew; Pierre Vaudaux; Stephan Harbarth; Willem van Leeuwen; Alex van Belkum; Dominique S Blanc; Didier Pittet; Jacques Schrenzel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Chad Laing; Crystal Pegg; Davis Yawney; Kim Ziebell; Marina Steele; Roger Johnson; James E Thomas; Eduardo N Taboada; Yongxiang Zhang; Victor P J Gannon Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2008-09-12 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Antonella Mencacci; Claudia Monari; Christian Leli; Luca Merlini; Elena De Carolis; Antonietta Vella; Maria Cacioni; Sara Buzi; Emanuela Nardelli; Francesco Bistoni; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Anna Vecchiarelli Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 5.948