Literature DB >> 12944178

Development of a biomarker-based index for assessing the ecotoxic potential of aquatic sites.

Nathalie Chèvre1, François Gagné, Christian Blaise.   

Abstract

The use of biochemical or physiological measurements as indicators of ecotoxicity is under constant development and has the advantage of delineating effects before the appearance of disease. However, these biomarkers are often part of a battery of tests, and it is difficult to integrate them together to gain an overall view of an organism's health. The aim of this study was to develop an index that could integrate the data derived from a battery of biomarkers for application to both spatial and temporal studies. Mya arenaria clams were collected at different sites along the Saguenay Fjord (Quebec, Canada). Six biomarkers were measured: metallothioneins, DNA strand breakage, lipid peroxidation, vitellin-like proteins, phagocytosis, and non-specific esterase activity in haemocytes. A biomarker index was obtained by summing the biomarker values expressed in term of classes. Classes were determined by a distribution-free approach derived from the theory of rough sets. The results of the spatial study show that the index values discriminated well between contaminated and uncontaminated sites. The highly polluted sites had the highest index values (18 compared with a reference value of 14). In the temporal study, the index was also able to highlight possible contamination-induced alterations, even though the interpretation of temporal variation is complicated by natural variations occurring throughout the year. A control chart approach is proposed for determining contaminated sites in both spatial and temporal surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12944178     DOI: 10.1080/1354750031000120134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomarkers        ISSN: 1354-750X            Impact factor:   2.658


  5 in total

1.  The influence of seasonality on biomarker responses in Mytilus edulis.

Authors:  Josephine A Hagger; David Lowe; Awantha Dissanayake; Malcolm B Jones; Tamara S Galloway
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  The integrated biomarker response revisited: optimization to avoid misuse.

Authors:  S Devin; T Burgeot; L Giambérini; L Minguez; S Pain-Devin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Integrated biomarker response index for the assessment of environmental stress of the Yangtze River (Nanjing section).

Authors:  C Wang; G H Lu; W T Song; S Xu; P F Wang
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.794

4.  A novel "Integrated Biomarker Response" calculation based on reference deviation concept.

Authors:  Wilfried Sanchez; Thierry Burgeot; Jean-Marc Porcher
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  A tool for protected area management: multivariate control charts 'cope' with rare variable communities.

Authors:  Thomas B Stringell; Roger N Bamber; Mark Burton; Charles Lindenbaum; Lucie R Skates; William G Sanderson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.