Literature DB >> 12943970

The mosquito problem and type and costs of personal protection measures used in rural and urban communities in Pondicherry region, South India.

K S Snehalatha1, K D Ramaiah, K N Vijay Kumar, P K Das.   

Abstract

Personal protection measures have become an important tool against mosquito nuisance. The severity of mosquito nuisance and the type and costs of personal protection measures in the Pondicherry region in South India have been investigated, using a structured questionnaire. The number of respondents sampled was 300 in the urban area and 100 in rural areas. 87 and 63% of the urban and rural respondents, respectively, felt that mosquito nuisance was severe in their locality. 83% of the urban and 27% of the rural respondents are aware that mosquitoes transmit diseases and were able to name at least one mosquito-borne disease. All the neighbourhood shops in urban and a majority in rural areas stocked personal protection products. As many as 99.3 and 73% of the urban and rural respondents, respectively, were found to use personal-protection measures during some or all seasons of the year. Mosquito coils were the most widely used measure in both urban and rural areas, followed by vaporising mats in the former and electric fans in the latter areas. 48 and 40% in urban and rural areas, respectively, used personal-protection measures daily. In urban areas 46% used the measures in more than one room. Only a small proportion (3-14%) used bed nets. The average monthly expenditure on the measures was Rupees (Rs.) 62.17 (US$ 1.30) (range: Rs. 0.00-500.00) in urban areas and Rs. 8.03 (US$ 0.17) (range Rs. 0.00-45.00) in rural areas. Annual expenditure on personal protection measures in urban areas amounted to 0.63% of the per capita income. 73.7% of the respondents in urban areas expressed satisfaction with the protective effect of the measures used by them. However, 46.3% of the urban and 15% of the rural respondents felt that the personal-protection measures are harmful to health. Some of the perceived harmful effects are allergy, breathing problems, cough and head ache.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12943970     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-706x(03)00155-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  13 in total

Review 1.  Urban lymphatic filariasis.

Authors:  Paul E Simonsen; Mbutolwe E Mwakitalu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Knowledge, attitudes and practices relevant to malaria control in remote island populations of manus, papua new Guinea.

Authors:  Yuji Ataka; Tsukasa Inaoka; Ryutaro Ohtsuka
Journal:  Trop Med Health       Date:  2011-12-01

3.  A cohort study of lymphatic filariasis on socio economic conditions in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Suryanaryana Murty Upadhyayula; Srinivasa Rao Mutheneni; Madhusudhan Rao Kadiri; Sriram Kumaraswamy; Balakrishna Nagalla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Knowledge and use of personal protective measures against mosquito borne diseases in a resettlement colony of delhi.

Authors:  T Anand; R Kumar; V Saini; Gs Meena; Gk Ingle
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-03

5.  Usage and Perceived Side Effects of Personal Protective Measures against Mosquitoes among Current Users in Delhi.

Authors:  Charu Kohli; Rajesh Kumar; G S Meena; M M Singh; Jyotiranjan Sahoo; G K Ingle
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-01-28

6.  Household-level expenditure on protective measures against mosquitoes on the island of La Réunion, France.

Authors:  Josselin Thuilliez; Claire Bellia; Jean-Sébastien Dehecq; Olivier Reilhes
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-01-02

7.  Community perceptions on malaria and care-seeking practices in endemic Indian settings: policy implications for the malaria control programme.

Authors:  Ashis Das; R K Das Gupta; Jed Friedman; Madan M Pradhan; Charu C Mohapatra; Debakanta Sandhibigraha
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 8.  Population migration: implications for lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes.

Authors:  K D Ramaiah
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  Management of filariasis using prediction rules derived from data mining.

Authors:  Duvvuri Venkata Rama Satya Kumar; Kumarawsamy Sriram; Kadiri Madhusudhan Rao; Upadhyayula Suryanarayana Murty
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2005-04-06

10.  The use of mosquito repellents at three sites in India with declining malaria transmission: surveys in the community and clinic.

Authors:  Anna Maria van Eijk; Lalitha Ramanathapuram; Patrick L Sutton; Nandini Peddy; Sandhya Choubey; Stuti Mohanty; Aswin Asokan; Sangamithra Ravishankaran; G Sri Lakshmi Priya; Justin Amala Johnson; Sangeetha Velayutham; Deena Kanagaraj; Ankita Patel; Nisha Desai; Nikunj Tandel; Steven A Sullivan; Samuel C Wassmer; Ranveer Singh; K Pradhan; Jane M Carlton; H C Srivasatava; Alex Eapen; S K Sharma
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.